PURPOSE: The association of BRCA2 polymorphisms at codon 372 [Asn (N)/His (H)]and codon 784 [Met (M)/Val (V)] with breast cancer risk was evaluated in Japanese women. In addition, the prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was studied in breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A case-control study was conducted to examine the association of the BRCA2 N/H372 polymorphism and M/V 784 polymorphism with breast cancer risk (cases = 149, controls = 154). The prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was evaluated in 139 patients with primary breast cancer. RESULTS: No significant association was observed between the N/H372 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In contrast, a significant increase in breast cancer risk (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.87) was observed in carriers of the variant allele (V784) of the M/V784 polymorphism as compared with noncarriers after adjustment for the classical risk factors, age, family history, parity, body mass index, and so forth. Among breast cancer patients, various clinicopathological parameters including menopausal status, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade, and estrogen-receptor status were not significantly different between the carriers and noncarriers of the variant allele with regard to both N/H372 and M/V784 polymorphisms. The N/H 372 polymorphism was not significantly associated with patient prognosis. On the other hand, breast cancer patients carrying the variant allele of M/V784 polymorphism showed a significantly (P = 0.014) lower 3-year disease-free survival rate (63%) than noncarriers (92%). Multivariate analysis has revealed that the M/V784 polymorphism is a significant prognostic factor, being independent of the other conventional prognostic factors such as lymph node status and estrogen receptor status. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the M/V784 polymorphism, but not the N/H372 polymorphism, would be useful in the selection of women at high risk for developing breast cancer and would also serve as a clinically useful prognostic factor in breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE: The association of BRCA2 polymorphisms at codon 372 [Asn (N)/His (H)]and codon 784 [Met (M)/Val (V)] with breast cancer risk was evaluated in Japanese women. In addition, the prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was studied in breast cancerpatients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A case-control study was conducted to examine the association of the BRCA2 N/H372 polymorphism and M/V 784 polymorphism with breast cancer risk (cases = 149, controls = 154). The prognostic significance of these polymorphisms was evaluated in 139 patients with primary breast cancer. RESULTS: No significant association was observed between the N/H372 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In contrast, a significant increase in breast cancer risk (odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.87) was observed in carriers of the variant allele (V784) of the M/V784 polymorphism as compared with noncarriers after adjustment for the classical risk factors, age, family history, parity, body mass index, and so forth. Among breast cancerpatients, various clinicopathological parameters including menopausal status, tumor size, lymph node status, histological grade, and estrogen-receptor status were not significantly different between the carriers and noncarriers of the variant allele with regard to both N/H372 and M/V784 polymorphisms. The N/H 372 polymorphism was not significantly associated with patient prognosis. On the other hand, breast cancerpatients carrying the variant allele of M/V784 polymorphism showed a significantly (P = 0.014) lower 3-year disease-free survival rate (63%) than noncarriers (92%). Multivariate analysis has revealed that the M/V784 polymorphism is a significant prognostic factor, being independent of the other conventional prognostic factors such as lymph node status and estrogen receptor status. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the M/V784 polymorphism, but not the N/H372 polymorphism, would be useful in the selection of women at high risk for developing breast cancer and would also serve as a clinically useful prognostic factor in breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Montserrat García-Closas; Kathleen M Egan; Polly A Newcomb; Louise A Brinton; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Stephen Chanock; Robert Welch; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Peplonska; Neonila Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Witold Zatonski; Alicja Bardin-Mikolajczak; Jeffery P Struewing Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2006-02-17 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Jane C Figueiredo; Jennifer D Brooks; David V Conti; Jenny N Poynter; Sharon N Teraoka; Kathleen E Malone; Leslie Bernstein; Won D Lee; David J Duggan; Ashley Siniard; Patrick Concannon; Marinela Capanu; Charles F Lynch; Jørgen H Olsen; Robert W Haile; Jonine L Bernstein Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 4.872