Literature DB >> 12684234

Short communication: time of day influences patient radiation exposure from percutaneous cardiac interventions.

E Kuon1, J B Dahm, M Schmitt, C Glaser, O Gefeller, A Pfahlberg.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of time of day on patient radiation exposure due to cardiac interventions. The elective interventional workload of one experienced cardiologist documented over the course of 4 months amounted to 325 diagnostic catheterizations and 145 percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). All radiation parameters documented during diagnostic coronary angiography remained constant throughout the entire day. In contrast, for PCI measurements made from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., our study revealed a mean overall dose-area product (DAP) of 11.8+/-6.8 Gy cm(2) (n=115). These radiation exposure levels increased significantly later in the afternoon (n=30) by 28% to a level of 15.0+/-11.1 Gy cm(2) (p<0.045). Cinegraphic DAP increased from 3.7+/-2.7 Gy cm(2) to 5.0+/-3.2 Gy cm(2) (p<0.033). The number of cinegraphic runs and frames rose from 7.9+/-2.9 to 9.1+/-3.1 (p<0.025), and from 136+/-63 to 164+/-70 (p<0.014), respectively. The following conclusion is warranted by our data and should now be confirmed in a wider multicentre study: radiation protection of the patients could be influenced by the fatigue of the cardiologist conducting the procedure. To enhance patient radiation safety, elective percutaneous angioplasty should be scheduled for the first 6 h of the interventionalist's occupational workload. Diagnostic interventions may be safely scheduled later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12684234     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/14780035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  7 in total

1.  Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.

Authors:  E Kuon; J B Dahm; D M Robinson; K Empen; M Günther; W Wucherer
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-10

2.  Effect of surgeon fatigue on hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Peskun; David Walmsley; James Waddell; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: does operative start time impact surgical and oncologic outcomes?

Authors:  Katrina N Slaughter; Michael Frumovitz; Kathleen M Schmeler; Alpa M Nick; Nicole D Fleming; Ricardo dos Reis; Mark F Munsell; Shannon N Westin; Pamela T Soliman; Pedro T Ramirez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Gareth Ambler; Rachael Sarpong; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Melanie Tan; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Louise Goodwin; Norman R Williams; John McGrath; Edward Rowe; Anthony Koupparis; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Radiation dose reference card for interventional radiology procedures: Experience in a tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Anna Varghese; Shyamkumar N Keshava; Vinu Moses; George Koshy; Suraj Mammen; Munawwar Ahmed; Roshan S Livingstone
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019-10-30

6.  Patient radiation doses in interventional cardiology procedures.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantos; Georgios Patatoukas; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Efstathios Efstathopoulos
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-01

7.  Comparison of radiation dose exposure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention vs. peripheral intervention.

Authors:  Salech Arif; Stanislaw Bartus; Tomasz Rakowski; Beata Bobrowska; Joanna Rutka; Anna Zabowka; Tomasz Tokarek; Dariusz Dudek; Jacek Dubiel
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.