RATIONALE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is currently treated with psychomotor stimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamine. Several adverse effects are associated with these drugs, however, such as agitation and abuse. H(3) receptor antagonists are under clinical investigation for ADHD. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential of thioperamide, a prototypical H(3) receptor antagonist, to enhance learning and attention while inducing no effects on locomotor stimulation and sensitization, or alterations in ACTH levels. METHODS: Thioperamide (1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg) was administered prior to testing in a multi-trial, inhibitory avoidance response in rat pups (five trials separated by 1 min) to evaluate attention/cognition. Locomotor sensitization and cross-sensitization was assessed following administration of methylphenidate (3 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg), or thioperamide (1, 3, 10 mg/kg). RESULTS: Thioperamide significantly enhanced performance of the five-trial inhibitory avoidance response with efficacy similar to that previously reported for methylphenidate. Administration of amphetamine, methylphenidate and cocaine produced significant locomotor sensitization, however. In contrast, thioperamide did not induce locomotor stimulation or sensitization, nor did it cross-sensitize to the stimulant effects of amphetamine or cocaine. The repeated administration of methylphenidate significantly elevated ACTH levels, while thioperamide did not affect this neuroendocrine endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: H(3) receptor blockade may offer a safer alternative to psychomotor stimulants for the treatment of ADHD.
RATIONALE: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is currently treated with psychomotor stimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamine. Several adverse effects are associated with these drugs, however, such as agitation and abuse. H(3) receptor antagonists are under clinical investigation for ADHD. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential of thioperamide, a prototypical H(3) receptor antagonist, to enhance learning and attention while inducing no effects on locomotor stimulation and sensitization, or alterations in ACTH levels. METHODS:Thioperamide (1, 3, 10, 30 mg/kg) was administered prior to testing in a multi-trial, inhibitory avoidance response in rat pups (five trials separated by 1 min) to evaluate attention/cognition. Locomotor sensitization and cross-sensitization was assessed following administration of methylphenidate (3 mg/kg), cocaine (10 mg/kg), or thioperamide (1, 3, 10 mg/kg). RESULTS:Thioperamide significantly enhanced performance of the five-trial inhibitory avoidance response with efficacy similar to that previously reported for methylphenidate. Administration of amphetamine, methylphenidate and cocaine produced significant locomotor sensitization, however. In contrast, thioperamide did not induce locomotor stimulation or sensitization, nor did it cross-sensitize to the stimulant effects of amphetamine or cocaine. The repeated administration of methylphenidate significantly elevated ACTH levels, while thioperamide did not affect this neuroendocrine endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: H(3) receptor blockade may offer a safer alternative to psychomotor stimulants for the treatment of ADHD.
Authors: Gerard B Fox; Jia Bao Pan; Timothy A Esbenshade; Youssef L Bennani; Lawrence A Black; Ramin Faghih; Arthur A Hancock; Michael W Decker Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: P Blandina; M Giorgetti; L Bartolini; M Cecchi; H Timmerman; R Leurs; G Pepeu; M G Giovannini Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: W E Pelham; H R Aronoff; J K Midlam; C J Shapiro; E M Gnagy; A M Chronis; A N Onyango; G Forehand; A Nguyen; J Waxmonsky Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 7.124