OBJECTIVES: In clinical drug development, wakefulness and wake-promotion may be assessed by a large number of scales and questionnaires. Objective assessment of wakefulness is most commonly made using sleep latency/maintenance of wakefulness tests, polysomnography and/or behavioral measures. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the degree of overlap in the assessment of wakefulness and cognition, with consideration of assessment techniques and the underlying neurobiology of both concepts. DESIGN: Reviews of four key areas were conducted: commonly used techniques in the assessment of wakefulness; neurobiology of sleep/wake and cognition; targets of wake promoting and/or cognition enhancing drugs; and ongoing clinical trials investigating wake promoting effects. RESULTS: There is clear overlap between the assessment of wakefulness and cognition. There are common techniques which may be used to assess both concepts; aspects of the neurobiology of both concepts may be closely related; and wake-promoting drugs may have nootropic properties (and vice versa). Clinical trials of wake-promoting drugs often, though not routinely, assess aspects of cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Routine and broad assessment of cognition in the development of wake-promoting drugs may reveal important nootropic effects, which are not secondary to alertness/wakefulness, whilst existing cognitive enhancers may have underexplored or unknown wake promoting properties.
OBJECTIVES: In clinical drug development, wakefulness and wake-promotion may be assessed by a large number of scales and questionnaires. Objective assessment of wakefulness is most commonly made using sleep latency/maintenance of wakefulness tests, polysomnography and/or behavioral measures. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the degree of overlap in the assessment of wakefulness and cognition, with consideration of assessment techniques and the underlying neurobiology of both concepts. DESIGN: Reviews of four key areas were conducted: commonly used techniques in the assessment of wakefulness; neurobiology of sleep/wake and cognition; targets of wake promoting and/or cognition enhancing drugs; and ongoing clinical trials investigating wake promoting effects. RESULTS: There is clear overlap between the assessment of wakefulness and cognition. There are common techniques which may be used to assess both concepts; aspects of the neurobiology of both concepts may be closely related; and wake-promoting drugs may have nootropic properties (and vice versa). Clinical trials of wake-promoting drugs often, though not routinely, assess aspects of cognition. CONCLUSIONS: Routine and broad assessment of cognition in the development of wake-promoting drugs may reveal important nootropic effects, which are not secondary to alertness/wakefulness, whilst existing cognitive enhancers may have underexplored or unknown wake promoting properties.
Authors: Annette E Fleckenstein; Trent J Volz; Evan L Riddle; James W Gibb; Glen R Hanson Journal: Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2007 Impact factor: 13.820
Authors: Maria I Lapid; Karen M Kuntz; Sara S Mason; Jeremiah A Aakre; Emily S Lundt; Walter Kremers; Laura A Allen; Daniel A Drubach; Bradley F Boeve Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: Francisco J Urbano; Verónica Bisagno; Betina González; María Celeste Rivero-Echeto; Javier A Muñiz; Brennon Luster; Stasia D'Onofrio; Susan Mahaffey; Edgar Garcia-Rill Journal: Sleep Sci Date: 2015-10-10