Literature DB >> 12682136

Influence of transferable genetic determinants on the outcome of typing methods commonly used for Enterococcus faecium.

Guido Werner1, Rob J L Willems, Bianca Hildebrandt, Ingo Klare, Wolfgang Witte.   

Abstract

A variety of methods is used for a molecular typing of Enterococcus spp. and related gram-positive bacteria including macrorestriction analysis using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), ribotyping, rapid amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). To test the influence of transferable determinants on the outcome of different typing methods commonly used for enterococci, we established a homogenous strain collection of 24 transconjugants resulting from filter matings with antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecium. As expected, AFLP, RAPD, and PFGE all identified our model bacteria as strongly related. However, distinct differences in the resolving and discriminatory power of the tested methods could be clearly addressed. In PFGE, 22 of 24 transconjugants possessed less than a three-band difference to the recipient pattern and would be regarded as strongly related. Three different RAPD PCRs were tested; in two reactions, identical patterns for all transconjugants and the recipient were produced. One RAPD PCR produced an identical pattern for 18 transconjugants and the recipient and a clearly different pattern for the remaining 6 transconjugants due to a newly appearing fragment resulting from acquisition of the tetL gene. AFLP clusters all transconjugants into a group of major relatedness. Percent similarities were highly dependent on the method used for calculating the similarity coefficient (curve-based versus band-based similarity coefficient). Fragment patterns of digested plasmids showed the possession of nonidentical plasmids in most transconjugants. PFGE still could be recommended as the method of choice. Nevertheless, the more-modern AFLP approach produces patterns of comparable discriminatory power while possessing some advantages over PFGE (less-time-consuming internal standards). Plasmid fingerprints can be included to subdifferentiate enterococcal isolates possessing identical macrorestriction and PCR typing patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12682136      PMCID: PMC153884          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1499-1506.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

Review 1.  Amplified-fragment length polymorphism analysis: the state of an art.

Authors:  P H Savelkoul; H J Aarts; J de Haas; L Dijkshoorn; B Duim; M Otsen; J L Rademaker; L Schouls; J A Lenstra
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  DNA banding pattern polymorphism in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and criteria for defining strains.

Authors:  D Morrison; N Woodford; S P Barrett; P Sisson; B D Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Random amplified polymorphic DNA typing versus pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for epidemiological typing of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  N Barbier; P Saulnier; E Chachaty; S Dumontier; A Andremont
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Arrangement of the vanA gene cluster in enterococci of different ecological origin.

Authors:  G Werner; I Klare; W Witte
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  Polymerase chain reaction-mediated typing of microorganisms: tracking dissemination of genes and genomes.

Authors:  A van Belkum; P W Hermans; L Licciardello; S Stefani; W Grubb; W van Leeuwen; W H Goessens
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 6.  How to select and interpret molecular strain typing methods for epidemiological studies of bacterial infections: a review for healthcare epidemiologists. Molecular Typing Working Group of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

Authors:  F C Tenover; R D Arbeit; R V Goering
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  On the nature and use of randomly amplified DNA from Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W van Leeuwen; M Sijmons; J Sluijs; H Verbrugh; A van Belkum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Strains of glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium can alter their van genotypes during an outbreak.

Authors:  N Woodford; P R Chadwick; D Morrison; B D Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A database system for fragment patterns of genomic DNA of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H Claus; C Cuny; B Pasemann; W Witte
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol       Date:  1998-01

10.  Antibiotic-resistant strains of Enterococcus isolated from Swedish and Danish retailed chicken and pork.

Authors:  M Quednau; S Ahrné; A C Petersson; G Molin
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  21 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new molecular system for simultaneous identification of four Enterococcus species and their glycopeptide resistance genotypes.

Authors:  U Eigner; A Fahr; M Weizenegger; W Witte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  VanB-type Enterococcus faecium clinical isolate successively inducibly resistant to, dependent on, and constitutively resistant to vancomycin.

Authors:  Alvaro San Millan; Florence Depardieu; Sylvain Godreuil; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibiotic Resistance of LACTOBACILLUS Strains.

Authors:  Elizaveta A Anisimova; Dina R Yarullina
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Clonal spread of a vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium strain among bloodstream-infecting isolates in Italy.

Authors:  Lucia Stampone; Maria Del Grosso; Delia Boccia; Annalisa Pantosti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Inducible expression eliminates the fitness cost of vancomycin resistance in enterococci.

Authors:  Marie-Laure Foucault; Florence Depardieu; Patrice Courvalin; Catherine Grillot-Courvalin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The key role of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in investigation of a large multiserotype and multistate food-borne outbreak of Salmonella infections centered in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Carol H Sandt; Donna A Krouse; Charles R Cook; Amy L Hackman; Wayne A Chmielecki; Nancy G Warren
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Population structure of Enterococcus faecium causing bacteremia in a Spanish university hospital: setting the scene for a future increase in vancomycin resistance?

Authors:  Teresa M Coque; Rob J L Willems; Jesús Fortún; Janetta Top; Sergio Diz; Elena Loza; Rafael Cantón; Fernando Baquero
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Typing of Multidrug Resistant Enterococcus faecium Urinary Isolates from a Tertiary Care Centre, Northern India.

Authors:  Tuhina Banerjee
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

9.  Transfer of vancomycin resistance transposon Tn1549 from Clostridium symbiosum to Enterococcus spp. in the gut of gnotobiotic mice.

Authors:  Aline Launay; Susan A Ballard; Paul D R Johnson; M Lindsay Grayson; Thierry Lambert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Genotypic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence factors of human isolates and probiotic cultures constituting two intraspecific groups of Enterococcus faecium isolates.

Authors:  Vanessa Vankerckhoven; Geert Huys; Marc Vancanneyt; Cindy Snauwaert; Jean Swings; Ingo Klare; Wolfgang Witte; Tim Van Autgaerden; Sabine Chapelle; Christine Lammens; Herman Goossens
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.