Literature DB >> 12680835

Speech recognition in elderly cochlear implant recipients.

E Pasanisi1, A Bacciu, V Vincenti, M Guida, A Barbot, M T Berghenti, S Bacciu.   

Abstract

The benefits of cochlear implantation in the adult and paediatric populations are well established. Cochlear implantation in the geriatric population still remains controversial because of the misconception that elderly patients might perform poorly. The purpose of this study was to report the speech performance of 16 patients over 65 years of age implanted with a Nucleus multichannel cochlear implant and to compare it with that of a control group of 14 adults aged between 41 and 59 years. At the 12 months postoperative evaluation, no significant differences were detected on speech performances between the elderly patients and the control group. The mean word recognition scores were 72.5% for the elderly group and 82% for the control group. The mean everyday sentence recognition scores were 72.5% for the elderly group and 85.7% for the control group. Overall, the results are encouraging and demonstrate that the elderly population with profound hearing loss obtain significant benefits from cochlear implantation despite the age-related auditory processing problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12680835     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00681.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  9 in total

1.  Audiovisual speech perception in elderly cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Cochlear implant rehabilitation in older adults: literature review and proposal of a conceptual framework.

Authors:  James H Clark; Jennifer Yeagle; Alicia I Arbaje; Frank R Lin; John K Niparko; Howard W Francis
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Recognition of spectrally degraded phonemes by younger, middle-aged, and older normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz; Monita Chatterjee; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Jon K Shallop; Sarah A Sydlowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

7.  Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Calli M Yancey; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

Review 8.  Cochlear Implantation in Hearing-Impaired Elderly: Clinical Challenges and Opportunities to Optimize Outcome.

Authors:  Angelika Illg; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people.

Authors:  Valéria Oyanguren; Maria Valéria Goffi Gomes; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens Brito Neto
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.