AIM: To compare the racial differences of anatomical distribution of colorectal cancer (CRC) and determine the association of age, gender and time with anatomical distribution between patients from America (white) and China (oriental). METHODS: Data was collected from 690 consecutive patients in Cleveland Clinic Florida, U.S.A. and 870 consecutive patients in Nan Fang Hospital affiliated to the First Military Medical University, China over the past 11 years from 1990 to 2000. All patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by histology and underwent surgery. RESULTS: The anatomical subsite distribution of tumor, age and gender were significantly different between white and oriental patients. Lesions in the proximal colon (P<0.001) were found in 36.3 % of white vs 26.0 % of oriental patients and cancers located in the distal colon and rectum in 63.7 % of white and 74 % of oriental patients (P<0.001). There was a trend towards the redistribution from distal colon and rectum to proximal colon in white males over time, especially in older patients (>80 years). No significant change of anatomical distribution occurred in white women and Oriental patients. The mean age at diagnosis was 69.0 years in white patients and 48.3 years in Oriental patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing the anatomical distribution of colorectal cancers in whites and Chinese patients. White Americans have a higher risk of proximal CRC and this risk increased with time. The proportion of white males with CRC also increased with time. Chinese patients were more likely to have distal CRC and developed the disease at a significantly earlier age than white patients. These findings have enhanced our understanding of the disease process of colorectal cancer in these two races.
AIM: To compare the racial differences of anatomical distribution of colorectal cancer (CRC) and determine the association of age, gender and time with anatomical distribution between patients from America (white) and China (oriental). METHODS: Data was collected from 690 consecutive patients in Cleveland Clinic Florida, U.S.A. and 870 consecutive patients in Nan Fang Hospital affiliated to the First Military Medical University, China over the past 11 years from 1990 to 2000. All patients had colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed by histology and underwent surgery. RESULTS: The anatomical subsite distribution of tumor, age and gender were significantly different between white and oriental patients. Lesions in the proximal colon (P<0.001) were found in 36.3 % of white vs 26.0 % of oriental patients and cancers located in the distal colon and rectum in 63.7 % of white and 74 % of oriental patients (P<0.001). There was a trend towards the redistribution from distal colon and rectum to proximal colon in white males over time, especially in older patients (>80 years). No significant change of anatomical distribution occurred in white women and Oriental patients. The mean age at diagnosis was 69.0 years in white patients and 48.3 years in Oriental patients (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing the anatomical distribution of colorectal cancers in whites and Chinese patients. White Americans have a higher risk of proximal CRC and this risk increased with time. The proportion of white males with CRC also increased with time. Chinese patients were more likely to have distal CRC and developed the disease at a significantly earlier age than white patients. These findings have enhanced our understanding of the disease process of colorectal cancer in these two races.
Authors: R J Coates; R S Greenberg; M T Liu; P Correa; L C Harlan; P Reynolds; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; M A Haynes; B F Hankey; C P Hunter Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1995-01 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Musthafa Chalikandy Peedikayil; Prem Nair; S M Seena; Lakshmi Radhakrishnan; Shine Sadasivan; V A Naryanan; V Balakrishnan Journal: Indian J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-04-28
Authors: E Urso; S Pucciarelli; M Agostini; I Maretto; C Mescoli; R Bertorelle; A Viel; M Rugge; D Nitti Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 2.571