Literature DB >> 12679775

Comparison of a silicon carbide-coated stent versus a noncoated stent in human beings: the Tenax versus Nir Stent Study's long-term outcome.

Martin Unverdorben1, Babett Sippel, Ralf Degenhardt, Katherine Sattler, Roland Fries, Bernd Abt, Eberhard Wagner, Henning Koehler, Gabriele Daemgen, Manfred Scholz, Hassan Ibrahim, Karl-Heinz Tews, Benno Hennen, Heiner K Berthold, Christian Vallbracht.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stents coated with amorphous hypothrombogenic silicon carbide (a-SiC:H) have low restenosis rates in humans. Recurrence in a-SiC:H at mid-term follow-up has been shown to be similar to a stainless steel device. The long-term outcome, however, may be different.
METHODS: Four hundred ninety-seven patients (63.4 +/- 9.8 years of age) received either the a-SiC:H-coated Tenax stent (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) or the 316L Nir stent (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, Minn). Lesions had to be covered with one stent only (diameter > or =2.8 mm, length <20 mm). Exclusion criteria comprised acute myocardial infarction and angiographic thrombus within the target vessel. Twenty-five of 497 (5%) patients were excluded for protocol violation. Clinical follow-up was completed in 450 of 472 (95.3%) and angiographic follow-up was completed in 365 of 472 (77.3%); 22 of 472 (4.7%) patients were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Major adverse coronary events occurred in 28 of 233 (12%) of the Tenax recipients and in 31 of 217 (14.3%) of the Nir recipients (P =.50). Acute myocardial infarctions were less frequent in the Tenax recipients after > or =60 weeks. Premature target lesion revascularization was performed in 16 of 233 (6.9%) patients in the Tenax group and 11 of 217 (5.1%) (P =.54) patients in the Nir group. Coronary bypass operations were similar after Tenax or Nir stent deployment (3/233 [1.3%] vs 6/217 [2.8%], P =.43), as were deaths in 7 of 233 (3%) versus 8 of 217 (3.7%) (P =.88), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Both stents had a low rate of major adverse coronary events at 81 +/- 12 weeks of follow-up, with no definite superiority of any of the devices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679775     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2003.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  Shortening the stent length reduces restenosis with bare metal stents: matched pair comparison of short stenting and conventional stenting.

Authors:  U Dietz; N Holz; C Dauer; H Lambertz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Surface engineering at the nanoscale: A way forward to improve coronary stent efficacy.

Authors:  Aleena Mary Cherian; Shantikumar V Nair; Vijayakumar Maniyal; Deepthy Menon
Journal:  APL Bioeng       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 3.  Surface engineering and the application of laser-based processes to stents - A review of the latest development.

Authors:  J Dong; M Pacella; Y Liu; L Zhao
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-08-28

4.  RADAR - A randomised, multi-centre, prospective study comparing best medical treatment versus best medical treatment plus renal artery stenting in patients with haemodynamically relevant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Uwe Schwarzwälder; Michael Hauk; Thomas Zeller
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Recent Advances in Manufacturing Innovative Stents.

Authors:  Natalia Beshchasna; Muhammad Saqib; Honorata Kraskiewicz; Łukasz Wasyluk; Oleg Kuzmin; Oana Cristina Duta; Denisa Ficai; Zeno Ghizdavet; Alexandru Marin; Anton Ficai; Zhilei Sun; Vladimir F Pichugin; Joerg Opitz; Ecaterina Andronescu
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 6.  Applying Principles of Regenerative Medicine to Vascular Stent Development.

Authors:  Prakash Parthiban Selvakumar; Michael Scott Rafuse; Richard Johnson; Wei Tan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.