Literature DB >> 12679045

Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude.

Michael A Khan1, Gavin Lawrence, Alissa Fourkas, Ian M Franks, Digby Elliott, Samantha Pembroke.   

Abstract

Researchers have suggested that visual feedback not only plays a role in the correction of errors during movement execution but that visual feedback from a completed movement is processed offline to improve programming on upcoming trials. In the present study, we examined the potential contribution of online and offline processing of visual feedback by analysing spatial variability at various kinematic landmarks in the limb trajectory (peak acceleration, peak velocity, peak negative acceleration and movement end). Participants performed a single degree of freedom video aiming task with and without vision of the cursor under four criterion movement times (225, 300, 375 and 450 ms). For movement times of 225 and 300 ms, the full vision condition was less variable than the no vision condition. However, the form of the variability profiles did not differ between visual conditions suggesting that the contribution of visual feedback was due to offline processes. In the 375 and 450 ms conditions, there was evidence for both online and offline control as the form of the variability profiles differed significantly between visual conditions. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12679045     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00156-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  21 in total

1.  The utilization of visual feedback from peripheral and central vision in the control of direction.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence; Ian M Franks; Eric Buckolz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Patrick Bédard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differences in visuomotor control between the upper and lower visual fields.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Gavin P Lawrence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of different submovement types during pointing to a target.

Authors:  Deric Wisleder; Natalia Dounskaia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-03-25

6.  Visual attention affects temporal estimation in anticipatory motor actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Congruent visual and proprioceptive information results in a better encoding of initial hand position.

Authors:  Louis-Nicolas Veilleux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Distinct and flexible rates of online control.

Authors:  John de Grosbois; Luc Tremblay
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-21

9.  Two-phase strategy of neural control for planar reaching movements: I. XY coordination variability and its relation to end-point variability.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Yury P Shimansky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effect of state anxiety on the online and offline control of fast target-directed movements.

Authors:  Gavin P Lawrence; Michael A Khan; Lew Hardy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.