Literature DB >> 12676483

Groundwater pollution and remediation options for multi-source contaminated aquifers (Bitterfeld/Wolfen, Germany).

P Wycisk1, H Weiss, A Kaschl, S Heidrich, K Sommerwerk.   

Abstract

Large-scale contaminated megasites like Bitterfeld/Wolfen in the eastern part of Germany are characterized by a regional pollution of soil, surface water and groundwater due to the long and varied history of the chemical industry on location. The pollutants in groundwater may spread to uncontaminated areas and endanger receptors like surface water and drinking water wells according to the site-specific hydrologic regime. In addition, the sheer extension of the contamination at megasites as well as the existence of large densely populated areas and land of high-reuse value prevent a simple risk management strategy of use restriction for the whole area. Since a complete clean-up of the groundwater on a megasite is neither economically feasible nor technically possible within a reasonable time-frame, a multi-approach remediation strategy is needed, taking into account the immediate risks for human health, ecosystem and so-called "protectable goods". Moreover, the contaminants at megasites typically represent a dangerous cocktail of multiple harmful substances stemming from a variety of sources, which may interact with each other and complicate the search for an appropriate remediation strategy. At the SAFIRA-project site in Bitterfeld approaches for in situ remediation of multiple contaminants in groundwater are being tested. Alternatives in local implementation strategies as well as consequences of long-term restrictions for megasites like Bitterfeld need an independent evaluation of the situation using a risk-based approach. For this reason, a GIS-based 3D model of the area including geology, contaminants, hydrogeology, land-use and protected areas has been built. The regional groundwater pollution is characterized by contamination profiles of all monitored substances. In the area of investigation, e.g. threefold and fourfold threshold levels of chlorinated methane, ethane and ethene as well as HCH-isomers, mono-, di- and tetrachlorobenzene, DDT-isomers and benzene are frequently detected in groundwater, that means in at least 60% of the wells that were sampled. High median values of more than 10 microg/l were calculated for cis/trans-1,2-dichloroethene, 1,2-dichloroethane, chloroethene and monochlorobenzene. In general, the regional distribution of contaminants reflect the different sources and pathways, and give first results from a regional point of view, depending on a land-use classification of specific areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12676483     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(03)00031-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  4 in total

1.  Application of preparative capillary gas chromatography (pcGC), automated structure generation and mutagenicity prediction to improve effect-directed analysis of genotoxicants in a contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  Cornelia Meinert; Emma Schymanski; Eberhard Küster; Ralph Kühne; Gerrit Schüürmann; Werner Brack
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Integrated methodology for assessing the HCH groundwater pollution at the multi-source contaminated mega-site Bitterfeld/Wolfen.

Authors:  Peter Wycisk; Reiner Stollberg; Christian Neumann; Wolfgang Gossel; Holger Weiss; Roland Weber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Seasonal variation of HCH isomers in open soil and plant-rhizospheric soil system of a contaminated environment.

Authors:  P C Abhilash; Nandita Singh
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Characterization of Chlorinated Aliphatic Hydrocarbons and Environmental Variables in a Shallow Groundwater in Shanghai Using Kriging Interpolation and Multifactorial Analysis.

Authors:  Qiang Lu; Qi Shi Luo; Hui Li; Yong Di Liu; Ji Dong Gu; Kuang Fei Lin; Kuang Fei Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.