Literature DB >> 12673713

Cytokeratin expression patterns in low-grade papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.

David Ramos1, Samuel Navarro, Rafael Villamón, Manuel Gil-Salom, Antonio Llombart-Bosch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The differential expression patterns of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and 34betaE12 antigen in low-grade papillary urothelial tumors of the bladder are discussed.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 120 patients with low-grade papillary bladder tumors (45 neoplasms of low malignant potential and 75 low-grade WHO G1 carcinomas) was performed. All tumors were graded in accordance with the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) and 1999 WHO classifications. The mean follow-up was 76.6 months (range, 36-168 mos), considering for prognostic purposes the time to first recurrence, or relapse-free interval (RFI), and the total number of recurrent patients. Immunohistochemically, normal or abnormal CK20 and 34betaE12 antigen expression patterns were determined for each patient. CK20 (clone IT-Ks) and a high-molecular weight cytokeratin (clone 34betaE12) were the monoclonal antibodies used in the immunohistochemical study.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven of 120 patients (64.2%) experienced a recurrence during follow-up. In recurrence prediction, the differential expression pattern of both cytokeratins showed a high sensitivity (76.6% for CK20 and 80.5% for 34betaE12 antigen) and a high positive predictive value (85.5% for CK20 and 75.6% for 34betaE12 antigen), although specificity was higher for CK20 (76.7%) than it was for 34betaE12 antigen (53.4%). Independent of adjuvant intravesical chemotherapy, these 2 markers showed a strong statistical correlation (p < 0.001) in univariate studies with both the prediction of disease recurrences and RFI.
CONCLUSIONS: CK20 and 34betaE12 antigen have proved to be strong predictive markers of disease recurrences when considering different topographic expression profiles, and, in the authors' opinion, these profiles could be incorporated into follow-up clinicopathologic strategies. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12673713     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  12 in total

1.  [Radical cystectomy in the treatment of bladder cancer always in due time?].

Authors:  M May; K-P Braun; W Richter; C Helke; H Vogler; B Hoschke; M Siegsmund
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential.

Authors:  M Scarpelli; R Montironi; L M Tarquini; P W Hamilton; A López Beltran; J Ranger-Moore; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Altered expression of CKs 14/20 is an early event in a rat model of multistep bladder carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rui M Gil da Costa; Paula A Oliveira; Carmen Vasconcelos-Nóbrega; Regina Arantes-Rodrigues; Rosário Pinto-Leite; Aura A Colaço; Luis F de la Cruz; Carlos Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  [Use of marker systems in the treatment of bladder cancer].

Authors:  M Burger; F Vom Dorp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Differential expression of cytokeratin 14 and 18 in bladder cancer tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Yun-Peng Li; Xiao-Peng Jia; Yu-Qing Jiang; Wei Wang; Yun-Liang Wang; Xiu-Li Wang; Yue-Xian Guo
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2018-01-19

6.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of bladder cancer-related transcript markers in urine.

Authors:  Juliane Schmidt; Catharina Propping; Woei-Yun Siow; Andrea Lohse-Fischer; Marieta Toma; Anka Baldauf-Twelker; Oliver W Hakenberg; Manfred P Wirth; Susanne Fuessel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  What are the currently available and in development molecular markers for bladder cancer? Will they prove to be useful in the future?

Authors:  Mohamed Ismat Abdulmajed; Eyüp Burak Sancak; Berkan Reşorlu; Gydhia Zuhair Al-Chalaby
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-10-15

8.  Prognostic value of keratin subtyping in transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  Cord Langner; Beate J Wegscheider; Peter Rehak; Manfred Ratschek; Richard Zigeuner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-09-18       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Long-term outcome of primary Papillary Urothelial Neoplasm of Low Malignant Potential (PUNLMP) including PUNLMP with inverted growth.

Authors:  Jay P Maxwell; Cheng Wang; Nicholas Wiebe; Asli Yilmaz; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  Diagnostic utility of p53 and CK20 immunohistochemical expression grading urothelial malignancies.

Authors:  Shazia Mumtaz; Atif Ali Hashmi; Sheema H Hasan; Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi; Mehmood Khan
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2014-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.