Literature DB >> 12672889

Issues of consent and feedback in a genetic epidemiological study of women with breast cancer.

M P M Richards1, M Ponder, P Pharoah, S Everest, J Mackay.   

Abstract

Women (N=21) who had had breast cancer and had been enrolled in a large genetic breast cancer epidemiological study were interviewed about their experience of participation in the study, their attitudes to the confidentiality of data, and the feedback of personal and general research results. Collection of family history information seemed more salient in indicating the genetic nature of the study than the enrolment information sheet. There were no concerns about confidentiality. While participants would have welcomed general feedback about the results of the study and were critical that this had not been provided, the feedback of personal information proved complicated and, sometimes, difficult. It is suggested that individual feedback of genetic test information in epidemiological studies should be undertaken only when there are specific reasons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672889      PMCID: PMC1733695          DOI: 10.1136/jme.29.2.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  2 in total

Review 1.  Solidarity and equity: new ethical frameworks for genetic databases.

Authors:  R Chadwick; K Berg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Protection of privacy by third-party encryption in genetic research in Iceland.

Authors:  J R Gulcher; K Kristjánsson; H Gudbjartsson; K Stefánsson
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.246

  2 in total
  25 in total

1.  Considerations in the construction of an instrument to assess attitudes regarding critical illness gene variation research.

Authors:  Bradley D Freeman; Carie R Kennedy; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Alexander Eastman; Ellen Iverson; Erica Shehane; Aaron Celious; Jennifer Barillas; Brian Clarridge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Parents' perspectives on participating in genetic research in autism.

Authors:  Magan Trottier; Wendy Roberts; Irene Drmic; Stephen W Scherer; Rosanna Weksberg; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Fiona A Miller
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-03

3.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 4.  Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen A Stepan; Amy P Gonzalez; Vivian S Dorsey; Debra K Frye; Nita D Pyle; Regina F Smith; Terry A Throckmorton; Louise A Villejo; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

6.  Receiving a summary of the results of a trial: qualitative study of participants' views.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Clare Jackson; Kate C Windridge; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-09

7.  Preferences regarding genetic research results: comparing veterans and nonveterans responses.

Authors:  N Arar; J Seo; S Lee; H E Abboud; L A Copeland; P Noel; M Parchman
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.

Authors:  Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Jonathan S Berg; Kyle Brothers; Ellen W Clayton; Wendy Chung; Barbara J Evans; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Carlos J Gallego; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Stacy W Gray; Ingrid A Holm; Iftikhar J Kullo; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Cathy McCarty; Cynthia A Prows; Heidi L Rehm; Richard R Sharp; Joseph Salama; Saskia Sanderson; Sara L Van Driest; Marc S Williams; Susan M Wolf; Wendy A Wolf; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Prospective biorepository participants' perspectives on access to research results.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; Sondra J Smolek
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Connecting patients, researchers and clinical genetics services: the experiences of participants in the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS).

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Loren Plunkett; Laura E Forrest; Nina Hallowell; Samantha Wake; Kathryn Alsop; Margaret Gleeson; David Bowtell; Gillian Mitchell; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.