Literature DB >> 12672840

Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.

B Willem Schreurs1, Truike M Thien, Maarten C de Waal Malefijt, Pieter Buma, René P H Veth, Tom J J H Slooff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular revision in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is often difficult because of the poor quality and quantity of the acetabular bone stock. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular revision with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup.
METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive acetabular revisions were performed with impaction bone-grafting and use of a cemented cup in twenty-eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The average age at the revision was fifty-seven years. The minimum duration of follow-up of all reconstructions that were still functioning or that were followed until the time of death was three years (mean, 7.5 years; range, three to fourteen years). No patient was lost to follow-up, but five patients (six hips) died before the time of the review. The acetabular bone defects were classified as cavitary in twelve hips and as combined segmental-cavitary in twenty-three.
RESULTS: The five patients (six hips) who died had been doing well at the time of their latest follow-up. Of the remaining patients, six (six hips) had a repeat revision. The average Harris hip score of the living patients with a surviving implant at the time of follow-up was 82 points, and there was no or only mild pain in twenty-one of the twenty-three hips. Radiographic analysis of all twenty-nine hips that had not been revised showed loosening in one hip and a nonprogressive radiolucent line in one zone in two others. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a prosthetic survival rate, with aseptic loosening as the end point, of 90% at eight years.
CONCLUSION: Acetabular revision with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis had acceptable results at an average of 7.5 years postoperatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672840     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200304000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Cavitary acetabular defects treated with morselized cancellous bone graft and cementless cups.

Authors:  G C T Pereira; E N Kubiak; B Levine; F S Chen; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Impregnation of bone chips with antibiotics and storage of antibiotics at different temperatures: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nina M C Mathijssen; Pieter L C Petit; Peter Pilot; B Wim Schreurs; Pieter Buma; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  Lower limb joint replacement in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; Stephen J Breusch; Leela C Biant
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.

Authors:  Ena Colo; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Bone graft incorporation after revision hip arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: seventy eight revisions using bone allografts with or without metal reinforcements.

Authors:  Jacek B Kowalczewski; Lidia Rutkowska-Sak; Dariusz Marczak; Iwona Słowińska; Radosław Słowiński; Marcin Sibiński
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  A novel, multi-level approach to assess allograft incorporation in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tim Rolvien; Christian Friesecke; Sebastian Butscheidt; Thorsten Gehrke; Michael Hahn; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.