Literature DB >> 12672561

Voles scale locomotion to the size of the open-field by adjusting the distance between stops: a possible link to path integration.

David Eilam1, Maya Dank, Roland Maurer.   

Abstract

In this study we show that social voles (Microtus socialis guentheri) preserve the same level of activity and spatio-temporal organization of behavior whether exploring a small (1 x 1 m) or a large (2 x 2 m) open field. In each open field, a vole established a home base from which it set on to round-trips of exploration; taking fewer but longer trips in the large open field, compared with more frequent but shorter trips in the small open field. Each trip comprised bouts of progression (locomotion) interrupted by stops. The number of stops per trip was the same for both large open field (longer trips) and small open field (shorter trips), and achieved by scaling the distance between stops according to the size of the open field. Voles traveled more along the walls in the large compared with the small open field. These adjustments in locomotor behavior to open field size were observed immediately after the voles were introduced into the arena, indicating that the perceived distances available for locomotion were identified by the voles immediately at the beginning of exploration. It is suggested that these properties of spontaneous exploration are an expression of navigation using visual landmarks and path integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672561     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00322-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Behavioral characterization of GLT1 (+/-) mice as a model of mild glutamatergic hyperfunction.

Authors:  Anna Kiryk; Tomomi Aida; Kohichi Tanaka; Pradeep Banerjee; Grzegorz M Wilczynski; Ksenia Meyza; Ewelina Knapska; Robert K Filipkowski; Leszek Kaczmarek; Wojciech Danysz
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.911

2.  Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment.

Authors:  Patrick Foo; Andrew Duchon; William H Warren; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-07

3.  Ethanol induces locomotor activating effects in preweanling Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Carlos Arias; Estela C Mlewski; Juan Carlos Molina; Norman E Spear
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.405

4.  Wall following in Xenopus laevis is barrier-driven.

Authors:  Sara Hänzi; Hans Straka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Fractionating dead reckoning: role of the compass, odometer, logbook, and home base establishment in spatial orientation.

Authors:  Douglas G Wallace; Megan M Martin; Shawn S Winter
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-14

6.  Network analysis of rat spatial cognition: behaviorally-established symmetry in a physically asymmetrical environment.

Authors:  Shahaf Weiss; Osnat Yaski; David Eilam; Juval Portugali; Efrat Blumenfeld-Lieberthal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Modulation of quinpirole-induced compulsive-like behavior in rats by environmental changes: implications for OCD rituals and for exploration and navigation.

Authors:  Pazit Zadicario; Sharon Ronen; David Eilam
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 3.288

8.  Locomotor activity in common spiny mice (Acomys cahirinuse): the effect of light and environmental complexity.

Authors:  David Eilam
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Attentive scanning behavior drives one-trial potentiation of hippocampal place fields.

Authors:  Joseph D Monaco; Geeta Rao; Eric D Roth; James J Knierim
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-30       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Rodents in open space adjust their behavioral response to the different risk levels during barn-owl attack.

Authors:  Shahaf Edut; David Eilam
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 2.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.