Literature DB >> 12672514

Effects of age on coping and psychological distress in women diagnosed with breast cancer: review of literature and analysis of two different geographical settings.

L Baider1, E Andritsch, B Uziely, G Goldzweig, P Ever-Hadani, G Hofman, G Krenn, H Samonigg.   

Abstract

Age-related differences in emotional distress were examined by studying two random samples (N=424) of women diagnosed with early stages of breast cancer in Graz, Austria and Jerusalem, Israel. We found that psychological distress, coping abilities, and different perceptions of illness are attributable to socialization differences of age experience according to young (49 or younger), intermediate (50-64) and old (65 and older) age groups. Patients were interviewed at home to obtain sociodemographic and medical background data. They also completed five standardized instruments (Brief Symptom Inventory, Psychological Adjustment to Illness Scale, Impact of Events Scale, Mental Adjustment to Cancer, and Perceived Family Support). A two-way MANOVA for all the demographic variables yielded significant main group (Graz vs. Jerusalem) effect (P<0.0001), significant main age effect (P<0.0001) and significant interaction (group by age) effect (P<0.001). Examination of the contribution of the age category to the level of the coping variables showed a different pattern in each group. The psychological distress variables revealed that, in the Jerusalem sample, there is a tendency toward decreasing distress levels with age and, in the Graz sample, elevated scores for the intermediate-age group. Age was found to be related to the level of Global Severity Index (GSI) and to the variables correlated to the GSI level. Psychological intervention should be guided to the different age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12672514     DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00134-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  12 in total

1.  Unmet needs of cancer survivors: supportive care's new challenge.

Authors:  Antonella Surbone; Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Use of non-conventional medicine two years after cancer diagnosis in France: evidence from the VICAN survey.

Authors:  Aline Sarradon-Eck; Anne-Déborah Bouhnik; Dominique Rey; Marc-Karim Bendiane; Laetitia Huiart; Patrick Peretti-Watel
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Unsupportive partner behaviors, social-cognitive processing, and psychological outcomes in couples coping with early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Scott Siegel; Shannon Myers Virtue; Carolyn Heckman; Danielle Ryan
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2014-03-10

4.  Psychosocial factors related to non-persistence with adjuvant endocrine therapy among women with breast cancer: the Breast Cancer Quality of Care Study (BQUAL).

Authors:  Dawn L Hershman; Lawrence H Kushi; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Ellie Coromilas; Donna Buono; Lois Lamerato; Dana H Bovbjerg; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Wei-Yann Tsai; Xiaobo Zhong; Judith S Jacobson; Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Correspondence of physical activity and fruit/vegetable consumption among prostate cancer survivors and their spouses.

Authors:  S Myers Virtue; S L Manne; D Kashy; C J Heckman; T Zaider; D W Kissane; I Kim; D Lee; G Olekson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  The impact of an ostomy on older colorectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  N M Verweij; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; Y T van Loon; F van den Bos; A Pronk; I H M Borel Rinkes; A H W Schiphorst
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Holding back sharing concerns, dispositional emotional expressivity, perceived unsupportive responses and distress among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Shannon Myers; Melissa Ozga; David Kissane; Debby Kashy; Stephen Rubin; Carolyn Heckman; Norm Rosenblum
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy as predictors of preparedness for oncology clinical trials: a mediational model.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Deborah Kashy; Terrance Albrecht; Yu-Ning Wong; Anne Lederman Flamm; Al B Benson; Suzanne M Miller; Linda Fleisher; Joanne Buzaglo; Nancy Roach; Michael Katz; Eric Ross; Michael Collins; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Dawn M Miller; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  A randomized controlled trial of a support group intervention on the quality of life and fatigue in women after primary treatment for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Helena Granstam Björneklett; Christina Lindemalm; Marja-Leena Ojutkangas; Anders Berglund; Henry Letocha; Peter Strang; Leif Bergkvist
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  A cross-sectional audit of distress in patients undergoing adjuvant therapy or follow-up in central nervous system malignancies.

Authors:  Vijay M Patil; Mridul Malhotra; Raees Tonse; Jayita Deodhar; Arun Chandrasekharan; Nikhil Pande; Atanu Bhattacharjee; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.