OBJECTIVES: Uncertainty exists regarding optimal prostate cancer screening parameters for high-risk populations. The purpose of this study is to report the use of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an indication for biopsy in men at increased risk for developing prostate cancer who have a normal digital rectal examination (DRE) and total PSA level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. METHODS: African-American men and men with at least one first-degree relative with prostate cancer are eligible for enrollment into the Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP) at our institution. Between October 1996 and April 2002, 310 asymptomatic high-risk men with no history of prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) were screened in the PRAP with DRE and total PSA. Percent free PSA was obtained in men with a total PSA between 2 and 10 ng/mL. Men with a normal DRE and total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL were advised to undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsies of the prostate if the percent free PSA was less than 27%. Other indications for biopsy included an abnormal DRE or a total PSA greater than 4 ng/mL. The primary endpoint evaluated was prostate cancer detection in high-risk men with a benign prostate examination, a normal total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL, and percent free PSA less than 27%. RESULTS: Of the 310 men, 174 (56%) were African American and 202 (65%) had at least one first-degree relative with prostate cancer. Sixty-two of the 310 men were referred for prostate biopsy, and 40 of 62 had biopsy performed. Twenty-one of 40 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer for a cancer detection rate of 53% in all men undergoing biopsy and an overall cancer detection rate of 6.8% in this high-risk population. Thirty-seven high-risk men (median age 54 years) with a total PSA level between 2 and 4 ng/mL (median 2.7 ng/mL) and a normal DRE were found to have a percent free PSA level of less than 27% (median 16%, range 8% to 25%). Twenty-three of these 37 men (62%) proceeded with the recommended prostate biopsy. Prostatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 12 of 23 men for a cancer detection rate of 52% in men undergoing biopsy and 32% in all men with a normal DRE, a total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL, and a percent free PSA less than 27%. All positive biopsies demonstrated clinically significant Gleason score 6 or 7 disease. In all men electing radical prostatectomy, bilateral organ-confined disease (pT2bN0M0) was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: In this unique population of men at high risk for prostate cancer, a percent free PSA of less than 27% was found to be useful for detecting early-stage but clinically significant cancers in men with a total PSA value between 2 and 4 ng/mL and normal DRE findings.
OBJECTIVES: Uncertainty exists regarding optimal prostate cancer screening parameters for high-risk populations. The purpose of this study is to report the use of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an indication for biopsy in men at increased risk for developing prostate cancer who have a normal digital rectal examination (DRE) and total PSA level between 2 and 4 ng/mL. METHODS: African-American men and men with at least one first-degree relative with prostate cancer are eligible for enrollment into the Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program (PRAP) at our institution. Between October 1996 and April 2002, 310 asymptomatic high-risk men with no history of prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) were screened in the PRAP with DRE and total PSA. Percent free PSA was obtained in men with a total PSA between 2 and 10 ng/mL. Men with a normal DRE and total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL were advised to undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsies of the prostate if the percent free PSA was less than 27%. Other indications for biopsy included an abnormal DRE or a total PSA greater than 4 ng/mL. The primary endpoint evaluated was prostate cancer detection in high-risk men with a benign prostate examination, a normal total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL, and percent free PSA less than 27%. RESULTS: Of the 310 men, 174 (56%) were African American and 202 (65%) had at least one first-degree relative with prostate cancer. Sixty-two of the 310 men were referred for prostate biopsy, and 40 of 62 had biopsy performed. Twenty-one of 40 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer for a cancer detection rate of 53% in all men undergoing biopsy and an overall cancer detection rate of 6.8% in this high-risk population. Thirty-seven high-risk men (median age 54 years) with a total PSA level between 2 and 4 ng/mL (median 2.7 ng/mL) and a normal DRE were found to have a percent free PSA level of less than 27% (median 16%, range 8% to 25%). Twenty-three of these 37 men (62%) proceeded with the recommended prostate biopsy. Prostatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 12 of 23 men for a cancer detection rate of 52% in men undergoing biopsy and 32% in all men with a normal DRE, a total PSA between 2 and 4 ng/mL, and a percent free PSA less than 27%. All positive biopsies demonstrated clinically significant Gleason score 6 or 7 disease. In all men electing radical prostatectomy, bilateral organ-confined disease (pT2bN0M0) was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: In this unique population of men at high risk for prostate cancer, a percent free PSA of less than 27% was found to be useful for detecting early-stage but clinically significant cancers in men with a total PSA value between 2 and 4 ng/mL and normal DRE findings.
Authors: Anita V Mitra; Elizabeth K Bancroft; Yolanda Barbachano; Elizabeth C Page; C S Foster; C Jameson; G Mitchell; G J Lindeman; A Stapleton; G Suthers; D G Evans; D Cruger; I Blanco; C Mercer; J Kirk; L Maehle; S Hodgson; L Walker; L Izatt; F Douglas; K Tucker; H Dorkins; V Clowes; A Male; A Donaldson; C Brewer; R Doherty; B Bulman; P J Osther; M Salinas; D Eccles; K Axcrona; I Jobson; B Newcombe; C Cybulski; W S Rubinstein; S Buys; S Townshend; E Friedman; S Domchek; T Ramon Y Cajal; A Spigelman; S H Teo; N Nicolai; N Aaronson; A Ardern-Jones; C Bangma; D Dearnaley; J Eyfjord; A Falconer; H Grönberg; F Hamdy; O Johannsson; V Khoo; Z Kote-Jarai; H Lilja; J Lubinski; J Melia; C Moynihan; S Peock; G Rennert; F Schröder; P Sibley; M Suri; P Wilson; Y J Bignon; S Strom; M Tischkowitz; A Liljegren; D Ilencikova; A Abele; K Kyriacou; C van Asperen; L Kiemeney; D F Easton; Rosalind A Eeles Journal: BJU Int Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Veda N Giri; Brian Egleston; Karen Ruth; Robert G Uzzo; David Y T Chen; Mark Buyyounouski; Susan Raysor; Stanley Hooker; Jada Benn Torres; Teniel Ramike; Kathleen Mastalski; Taylor Y Kim; Rick Kittles Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2009-02-24
Authors: Elizabeth K Bancroft; Elizabeth C Page; Elena Castro; Hans Lilja; Andrew Vickers; Daniel Sjoberg; Melissa Assel; Christopher S Foster; Gillian Mitchell; Kate Drew; Lovise Mæhle; Karol Axcrona; D Gareth Evans; Barbara Bulman; Diana Eccles; Donna McBride; Christi van Asperen; Hans Vasen; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Janneke Ringelberg; Cezary Cybulski; Dominika Wokolorczyk; Christina Selkirk; Peter J Hulick; Anders Bojesen; Anne-Bine Skytte; Jimmy Lam; Louise Taylor; Rogier Oldenburg; Ruben Cremers; Gerald Verhaegh; Wendy A van Zelst-Stams; Jan C Oosterwijk; Ignacio Blanco; Monica Salinas; Jackie Cook; Derek J Rosario; Saundra Buys; Tom Conner; Margreet G Ausems; Kai-ren Ong; Jonathan Hoffman; Susan Domchek; Jacquelyn Powers; Manuel R Teixeira; Sofia Maia; William D Foulkes; Nassim Taherian; Marielle Ruijs; Apollonia T Helderman-van den Enden; Louise Izatt; Rosemarie Davidson; Muriel A Adank; Lisa Walker; Rita Schmutzler; Kathy Tucker; Judy Kirk; Shirley Hodgson; Marion Harris; Fiona Douglas; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Janez Zgajnar; Marc Tischkowitz; Virginia E Clowes; Rachel Susman; Teresa Ramón y Cajal; Nicholas Patcher; Neus Gadea; Allan Spigelman; Theo van Os; Annelie Liljegren; Lucy Side; Carole Brewer; Angela F Brady; Alan Donaldson; Vigdis Stefansdottir; Eitan Friedman; Rakefet Chen-Shtoyerman; David J Amor; Lucia Copakova; Julian Barwell; Veda N Giri; Vedang Murthy; Nicola Nicolai; Soo-Hwang Teo; Lynn Greenhalgh; Sara Strom; Alex Henderson; John McGrath; David Gallagher; Neil Aaronson; Audrey Ardern-Jones; Chris Bangma; David Dearnaley; Philandra Costello; Jorunn Eyfjord; Jeanette Rothwell; Alison Falconer; Henrik Gronberg; Freddie C Hamdy; Oskar Johannsson; Vincent Khoo; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Jan Lubinski; Ulrika Axcrona; Jane Melia; Joanne McKinley; Anita V Mitra; Clare Moynihan; Gad Rennert; Mohnish Suri; Penny Wilson; Emma Killick; Sue Moss; Rosalind A Eeles Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Elizabeth K Bancroft; Sibel Saya; Elizabeth C Page; Kathryn Myhill; Sarah Thomas; Jennifer Pope; Anthony Chamberlain; Rachel Hart; Wayne Glover; Jackie Cook; Derek J Rosario; Brian T Helfand; Christina Hutten Selkirk; Rosemarie Davidson; Mark Longmuir; Diana M Eccles; Neus Gadea; Carole Brewer; Julian Barwell; Monica Salinas; Lynn Greenhalgh; Marc Tischkowitz; Alex Henderson; David Gareth Evans; Saundra S Buys; Rosalind A Eeles; Neil K Aaronson Journal: BJU Int Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: C Cybulski; D Wokołorczyk; W Kluźniak; A Kashyap; A Gołąb; M Słojewski; A Sikorski; M Puszyński; M Soczawa; T Borkowski; A Borkowski; A Antczak; J Przybyła; M Sosnowski; B Małkiewicz; R Zdrojowy; P Domagała; K Piotrowski; J Menkiszak; K Krzystolik; J Gronwald; A Jakubowska; B Górski; T Dębniak; B Masojć; T Huzarski; K R Muir; A Lophatananon; J Lubiński; S A Narod Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-05-30 Impact factor: 7.640