BACKGROUND: Drug allergies are unpredictable immunologic adverse effects, usually immunoglobulin E-mediated immediate hypersensitivity or T-cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity. There is a paucity of accurate prospective data on drug allergy in hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, manifestations, and outcome of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. METHODS: All newly developed cases, confirmed or suspected, of drug allergy in inpatients using a network-based electronic notification system. Each notification was evaluated by an allergist-immunologist during the same admission. RESULTS: From December 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999, 366 cases were reported from a total of 90,910 admissions. After review, only 210 cases were verified to have drug allergy. Antimicrobials and anti-epileptic drugs comprised 75% of the drug allergies reported. Cutaneous eruptions were the most common clinical presentation (95.7%), with maculopapular rash being the most common morphology. Systemic manifestations occurred in 30%, of which hepatitis was the most common. Serious adverse reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and generalized exfoliative dermatitis occurred in 11 (5.2%) patients. There was no case of anaphylaxis attributable to drug allergy. After adjusting for underreporting, the incidence of drug allergy in our hospitalized patients was 4.20 per 1,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.93 to 5.46), drug allergy developing during the course of inpatient treatment 2.07 per 1,000 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.69), and mortality attributable to drug allergy 0.09 per 1,000 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.12) hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: A network-based, allergist-immunologist-verified, surveillance system enables more accurate labeling of drug allergy. The incidence of drug allergy and mortality in hospitalized patients is low.
BACKGROUND:Drug allergies are unpredictable immunologic adverse effects, usually immunoglobulin E-mediated immediate hypersensitivity or T-cell-mediated delayed hypersensitivity. There is a paucity of accurate prospective data on drug allergy in hospitalized patients. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence, manifestations, and outcome of drug allergy in hospitalized patients. METHODS: All newly developed cases, confirmed or suspected, of drug allergy in inpatients using a network-based electronic notification system. Each notification was evaluated by an allergist-immunologist during the same admission. RESULTS: From December 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999, 366 cases were reported from a total of 90,910 admissions. After review, only 210 cases were verified to have drug allergy. Antimicrobials and anti-epileptic drugs comprised 75% of the drug allergies reported. Cutaneous eruptions were the most common clinical presentation (95.7%), with maculopapular rash being the most common morphology. Systemic manifestations occurred in 30%, of which hepatitis was the most common. Serious adverse reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and generalized exfoliative dermatitis occurred in 11 (5.2%) patients. There was no case of anaphylaxis attributable to drug allergy. After adjusting for underreporting, the incidence of drug allergy in our hospitalized patients was 4.20 per 1,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.93 to 5.46), drug allergy developing during the course of inpatient treatment 2.07 per 1,000 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.69), and mortality attributable to drug allergy 0.09 per 1,000 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.12) hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: A network-based, allergist-immunologist-verified, surveillance system enables more accurate labeling of drug allergy. The incidence of drug allergy and mortality in hospitalized patients is low.
Authors: Kimberly G Blumenthal; Anna R Wolfson; Yu Li; Claire M Seguin; Neelam A Phadke; Aleena Banerji; Elizabeth Mort Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 2.844
Authors: Yun-Jeong Bae; Ye Won Hwang; Sun-Young Yoon; Sujeong Kim; Taehoon Lee; Yoon Su Lee; Hyouk-Soo Kwon; You Sook Cho; Myung Jin Shin; Hee-Bom Moon; Tae-Bum Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 3.240