Literature DB >> 12669750

The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting.

Stefanie Schuch1, Iring Koch.   

Abstract

Response selection in task shifting was explored using a go/no-go methodology. The no-go signal occurred unpredictably with stimulus onset so that all trials required task preparation but only go trials required response selection. Experiment 1 showed that shift costs were absent after no-go trials, indicating that response processes are crucial for shift costs. In Experiment 2, backward inhibition was absent after no-go trials. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrated that response selection, rather than execution, causes backward inhibition. All 4 experiments showed effects of preparation time in go trials, suggesting that advance preparation must have also occurred in no-go trials. The authors concluded that inhibition of irrelevant task sets arises only at response selection and that residual shift costs reflect such persisting inhibition.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12669750     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  96 in total

1.  The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Preparation for a forthcoming task is sufficient to produce subsequent shift costs.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

3.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

4.  On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  James A Grange; Ion Juvina; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

Review 5.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Task conflict effect in task switching.

Authors:  Ami Braverman; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-03-23

7.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

8.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

9.  Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Wolfgang Prinz; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

10.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching.

Authors:  Matthew C Davidson; Dima Amso; Loren Cruess Anderson; Adele Diamond
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.