H N Mayrovitz1, N Sims, J Macdonald. 1. Nova Southeastern University, College of Medical Sciences, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limb edema and lymphedema due to chronic venous insufficiency or mastectomy and radiotherapy negatively effects patient well-being, lifestyle, tissue blood flow, oxygenation, and wound healing. Assessment of the efficacy of volume reduction therapy requires adequate estimation of progressive limb-segment volume changes, which are usually done manually with a tape measure. This study investigated the possibility that an optoelectronic automated method--a potentially less time-consuming and less operator-dependent method--might provide adequate limb volume assessment. DESIGN: A total of 184 manual and automated measurements of limb volume were made in 62 consecutive patients with limb edema of the legs (n = 142) and arms (n = 42). SETTING: Clinical center. RESULTS: Comparisons between automated and manual methods showed that inter-method volume estimates were highly correlated (4.14 +/- 0.54% for legs; 6.97 +/- 1.18% for arms). In patients with unilateral edema, the affected limb's percentage of edema was virtually identical when estimated by each method. CONCLUSION: These findings show that the automated method of measuring limb volume is a useful alternative in suitable patients in clinical and research applications.
OBJECTIVE:Limb edema and lymphedema due to chronic venous insufficiency or mastectomy and radiotherapy negatively effects patient well-being, lifestyle, tissue blood flow, oxygenation, and wound healing. Assessment of the efficacy of volume reduction therapy requires adequate estimation of progressive limb-segment volume changes, which are usually done manually with a tape measure. This study investigated the possibility that an optoelectronic automated method--a potentially less time-consuming and less operator-dependent method--might provide adequate limb volume assessment. DESIGN: A total of 184 manual and automated measurements of limb volume were made in 62 consecutive patients with limb edema of the legs (n = 142) and arms (n = 42). SETTING: Clinical center. RESULTS: Comparisons between automated and manual methods showed that inter-method volume estimates were highly correlated (4.14 +/- 0.54% for legs; 6.97 +/- 1.18% for arms). In patients with unilateral edema, the affected limb's percentage of edema was virtually identical when estimated by each method. CONCLUSION: These findings show that the automated method of measuring limb volume is a useful alternative in suitable patients in clinical and research applications.
Authors: Jason M Green; Sowjanya Paladugu; Xu Shuyu; Bob R Stewart; Chi-Ren Shyu; Jane M Armer Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Caroline E Fife; Suzanne Davey; Erik A Maus; Renie Guilliod; Harvey N Mayrovitz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rolf P Engelberger; Claudia Blazek; Felix Amsler; Hong H Keo; Frédéric Baumann; Werner Blättler; Iris Baumgartner; Torsten Willenberg Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 4.615