OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in food sources of dietary fat made by participants in the Women's Health Initiative Low-Fat Dietary Modification Trial. DESIGN: This study compares sources of dietary fat intake, estimated by a food frequency questionnaire, between intervention and control participants at baseline, 1 year (year 1) and 2 years (year 2) after randomization. The outcome measure was intake of fat in grams per day. Results are given on consumption of fat from six food groups and the intervention effect, defined as mean change in the intervention group minus the change in controls, controlling for baseline fat intake. PARTICIPANTS: 5,004 intervention and 7,426 control postmenopausal women in 40 clinical centers across the United States. RESULTS: At baseline, the major sources of fat were added fats, such as butter, oils, and salad dressings (25%); meats (21%); and desserts (13%). From baseline to year 1, the intervention group reduced fat by 24.3 g/day compared with the control group. Reductions came primarily from added fats (9.1 g/day), meats (4.6 g/day), and desserts (3.9 g/day). White people reduced added fats more than other race/ethnicity groups did, white and Hispanic people were more likely to reduce fat intake from milk and cheese compared with other groups, and Hispanics reduced fat from mixed dishes more than did other race/ethnicity groups (P<.05 for all). APPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that women in the Women's Health Initiative dietary change intervention made substantial changes in food choices. These results can facilitate future low-fat interventions, and also offer clinical applications, by identifying foods that may be refractory to change.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in food sources of dietary fat made by participants in the Women's Health Initiative Low-Fat Dietary Modification Trial. DESIGN: This study compares sources of dietary fat intake, estimated by a food frequency questionnaire, between intervention and control participants at baseline, 1 year (year 1) and 2 years (year 2) after randomization. The outcome measure was intake of fat in grams per day. Results are given on consumption of fat from six food groups and the intervention effect, defined as mean change in the intervention group minus the change in controls, controlling for baseline fat intake. PARTICIPANTS: 5,004 intervention and 7,426 control postmenopausal women in 40 clinical centers across the United States. RESULTS: At baseline, the major sources of fat were added fats, such as butter, oils, and salad dressings (25%); meats (21%); and desserts (13%). From baseline to year 1, the intervention group reduced fat by 24.3 g/day compared with the control group. Reductions came primarily from added fats (9.1 g/day), meats (4.6 g/day), and desserts (3.9 g/day). White people reduced added fats more than other race/ethnicity groups did, white and Hispanic people were more likely to reduce fat intake from milk and cheese compared with other groups, and Hispanics reduced fat from mixed dishes more than did other race/ethnicity groups (P<.05 for all). APPLICATIONS/ CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that women in the Women's Health Initiative dietary change intervention made substantial changes in food choices. These results can facilitate future low-fat interventions, and also offer clinical applications, by identifying foods that may be refractory to change.
Authors: Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen J Moore; George Davey Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-05-16
Authors: Cynthia A Thomson; Linda Van Horn; Bette J Caan; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; JoAnn E Manson; Thomas E Rohan; Lesley F Tinker; Lewis H Kuller; Lifang Hou; Dorothy S Lane; Karen C Johnson; Mara Z Vitolins; Ross L Prentice Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jiali Zheng; Fred K Tabung; Jiajia Zhang; Angela D Liese; Nitin Shivappa; Judith K Ockene; Bette Caan; Candyce H Kroenke; James R Hébert; Susan E Steck Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Susan E Steck; Yunsheng Ma; Angela D Liese; Jiajia Zhang; Bette Caan; Lifang Hou; Karen C Johnson; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Nitin Shivappa; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Judith K Ockene; James R Hebert Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-12-31 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Jiali Zheng; Fred K Tabung; Jiajia Zhang; E Angela Murphy; Nitin Shivappa; Judith K Ockene; Bette Caan; Candyce H Kroenke; James R Hébert; Susan E Steck Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Anne McTiernan; Jean Wactawski-Wende; LieLing Wu; Rebecca J Rodabough; Nelson B Watts; Frances Tylavsky; Ruth Freeman; Susan Hendrix; Rebecca Jackson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Suzen M Moeller; Rick Voland; Gloria E Sarto; Vicki L Gobel; Sharyn L Streicher; Julie A Mares Journal: J Nutr Date: 2009-07-08 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Lee Hooper; Carolyn D Summerbell; Rachel Thompson; Deirdre Sills; Felicia G Roberts; Helen Moore; George Davey Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-07-06