Literature DB >> 12668608

Genomic inversions of human chromosome 15q11-q13 in mothers of Angelman syndrome patients with class II (BP2/3) deletions.

Giorgio Gimelli1, Miguel Angel Pujana, Maria Grazia Patricelli, Silvia Russo, Daniela Giardino, Lidia Larizza, Joseph Cheung, Lluís Armengol, Albert Schinzel, Xavier Estivill, Orsetta Zuffardi.   

Abstract

Parental submicroscopic genomic inversions have recently been demonstrated to be present in several genomic disorders. These inversions are genomic polymorphisms that facilitate misalignment and abnormal recombination between flanking segmental duplications. Angelman syndrome (AS; MIM 105830) is associated with specific abnormalities of chromosome 15q11-q13, with about 70% of cases being mother-of-origin 4 Mb deletions. We present here evidence that some mothers of AS patients with deletions of the 15q11-q13 region have a heterozygous inversion involving the region that is deleted in the affected offspring. The inversion was detected in the mothers of four of six AS cases with the breakpoint 2-3 (BP2/3) 15q11-q13 deletion, but not in seven mothers of AS due to paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) 15. We have identified variable inversion breakpoints within BP segmental duplications in the inverted AS mothers, as well as in AS deleted patients. Interestingly, the BP2-BP3 region is inverted in the mouse draft genome sequence with respect to the human draft sequence. The BP2-BP3 chromosome 15q11-q13 inversion was detected in four of 44 subjects (9%) of the general population (P<0.004). The BP2/3 inversion should be an intermediate estate that facilitates the occurrence of 15q11-q13 BP2/3 deletions in the offspring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12668608     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  56 in total

Review 1.  Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes.

Authors:  Anja Weise; Kristin Mrasek; Elisabeth Klein; Milene Mulatinho; Juan C Llerena; David Hardekopf; Sona Pekova; Samarth Bhatt; Nadezda Kosyakova; Thomas Liehr
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.479

2.  Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Minmei Hou; Ping Yao; Angela Antonou; Mitrick A Johns
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Evidence for widespread reticulate evolution within human duplicons.

Authors:  Michael S Jackson; Karen Oliver; Jane Loveland; Sean Humphray; Ian Dunham; Mariano Rocchi; Luigi Viggiano; Jonathan P Park; Matthew E Hurles; Mauro Santibanez-Koref
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome.

Authors:  Andrew J Sharp; Devin P Locke; Sean D McGrath; Ze Cheng; Jeffrey A Bailey; Rhea U Vallente; Lisa M Pertz; Royden A Clark; Stuart Schwartz; Rick Segraves; Vanessa V Oseroff; Donna G Albertson; Daniel Pinkel; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Analysis of segmental duplications reveals a distinct pattern of continuation-of-synteny between human and mouse genomes.

Authors:  Michael R Mehan; Maricel Almonte; Erin Slaten; Nelson B Freimer; P Nagesh Rao; Roel A Ophoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Copy number variation at the 7q11.23 segmental duplications is a susceptibility factor for the Williams-Beuren syndrome deletion.

Authors:  Ivon Cuscó; Roser Corominas; Mònica Bayés; Raquel Flores; Núria Rivera-Brugués; Victoria Campuzano; Luis A Pérez-Jurado
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Polymorphic micro-inversions contribute to the genomic variability of humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Justyna M Szamalek; David N Cooper; Werner Schempp; Peter Minich; Matthias Kohn; Josef Hoegel; Violaine Goidts; Horst Hameister; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Deletions flanked by breakpoints 3 and 4 on 15q13 may contribute to abnormal phenotypes.

Authors:  Jill A Rosenfeld; Lindsey E Stephens; Justine Coppinger; Blake C Ballif; Joe J Hoo; Beatrice N French; Valerie C Banks; Wendy E Smith; David Manchester; Anne Chun-Hui Tsai; Katrina Merrion; Roberto Mendoza-Londono; Lucie Dupuis; Roger Schultz; Beth Torchia; Trilochan Sahoo; Bassem Bejjani; David D Weaver; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  On the sequence-directed nature of human gene mutation: the role of genomic architecture and the local DNA sequence environment in mediating gene mutations underlying human inherited disease.

Authors:  David N Cooper; Albino Bacolla; Claude Férec; Karen M Vasquez; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; Jian-Min Chen
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Aberrant interchromosomal exchanges are the predominant cause of the 22q11.2 deletion.

Authors:  Sulagna C Saitta; Stacy E Harris; Ann P Gaeth; Deborah A Driscoll; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Melissa K Maisenbacher; Jill M Yersak; Prabir K Chakraborty; April M Hacker; Elaine H Zackai; Terry Ashley; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.