Literature DB >> 12667726

Division of lymphatic vessels at varicocelectomy leads to testicular oedema and decline in testicular function according to the LH-RH analogue stimulation test.

Radim Kocvara1, Jirí Dolezal, Richard Hampl, Ctibor Povýsil, Jan Dvorácek, Martin Hill, Zdenek Díte, Zdenek Stanek, Kvetoslav Novák.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the andrological outcome of the division of testicular lymphatic vessels at varicocelectomy in children and adolescents.
METHODS: Testicular size and basal and stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) values were determined prospectively in 86 patients with left unilateral varicocele grades II-III. 22 patients underwent lymphatic non-sparing surgery (LNS group), 10 of them with artery sparing (LNS/AS) and 12 without artery sparing (LNS/ANS), 23 patients underwent lymphatic sparing repair (LS group) and 41 patients were treated conservatively (NT group).
RESULTS: The LNS group demonstrated significantly greater left testicular enlargement at six weeks and one year following repair, left testicular hypertrophy developed in 31.8% and hydrocele in 22.7% of patients. Marked oedema of intertubular tissue and a varying degree of tubular injury was observed in boys surgically treated for hydrocele. In the LS group, neither hypertrophy nor hydrocele developed postoperatively, the LH stimulated values were lower than in LNS/ANS group (p<0.05) and the NT group (p<0.04), the FSH stimulated values were lower than in the LNS/ANS group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Division of lymphatic vessels at varicocelectomy is associated with an excessive increase in testicular volume due to oedema, and with a reduced testicular function according to higher LH and FSH stimulated values. Preservation of lymphatics is strongly advised in varicocelectomy in adolescents to ensure better andrological outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667726     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00051-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  14 in total

1.  Lymphatic sparing, laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a new surgical technique.

Authors:  H L Tan; B Tecson; M Z Ee; J Tantoco
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Evaluation of testicular catch-up growth in adolescent microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Ercüment Keskin; Mehmet Karabakan; İbrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kürşat Yılmazel; Ertuğrul Gazi Özbey; Yılmaz Aksoy; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

3.  Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience.

Authors:  Shiu-Dong Chung; Chia-Chang Wu; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chen-Hsun Ho; Stephen Shei Dei Yang; Yao-Chou Tsai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  The Dilemma of Adolescent Varicoceles: Do They Really Have to Be Repaired?

Authors:  Bryan S Sack; Mattias Schäfer; Michael P Kurtz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Zhang; Xingxing Ruan; Hengjun Xiao; Wentao Huang; Liaoyuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The validity of testicular catch-up growth and serum FSH levels in the long-term postoperative assessment of laparoscopic varicocele correction in adolescents.

Authors:  Aniruddh Deshpande; Ralph Cohen; Irene Tsang; Geoff Ambler; Steven Fleming
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2011-01

7.  Ipsilateral testicular catch-up growth rate following microsurgical inguinal adolescent varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Orhun Sinanoglu; Seyit Erkan Eyyupoglu; Sinan Ekici
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-07-31

8.  Comparison of laparoscopic and microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in terms of postoperative scrotal pain.

Authors:  Haluk Söylemez; Necmettin Penbegül; Murat Atar; Yaşar Bozkurt; Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar; Bülent Altunoluk
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Surgical management of adolescent varicocele: Systematic review of the world literature.

Authors:  Omer A Raheem
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-07

10.  Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Xiao-Peng Liu; Xiao-Jian Yang; Wen-Tao Huang; Xing-Xing Ruan; Heng-Jun Xiao; Liao-Yuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.