Literature DB >> 12663406

Cross sectional survey of effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in reducing serum cholesterol concentration in patients in 17 general practices.

Julia Hippisley-Cox1, Ruth Cater, Mike Pringle, Carol Coupland.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in lowering serum cholesterol concentrations.
DESIGN: Cross sectional study.
SETTING: 17 practices within 17 primary care groups in Trent region, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 35 years or over taking lipid lowering drugs and with at least two serum cholesterol concentrations recorded on computer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients achieving serum cholesterol concentration of < or =5 mmol/l and mean percentage reduction in serum cholesterol concentration.
RESULTS: 1353 of 2469 (54.8%) patients receiving lipid lowering treatment had a last recorded serum cholesterol concentration of < or =5 mmol/l. Significantly more patients taking statins achieved the target value for serum cholesterol (5 mmol/l) than those taking fibrates (1307 (57%) v 46 (26%); P<0.0001). Atorvastatin and simvastatin were the most effective drugs in achieving the target. Significant differences were found between lipid lowering drugs for the pretreatment serum cholesterol concentration, the most recent cholesterol concentration, and the associated percentage reduction. Atorvastatin and simvastatin achieved the greatest percentage reduction in serum cholesterol concentrations (30.1%, 95% confidence interval 28.8% to 31.4%, and 28.0%, 26.7% to 29.3%, respectively). Although the mean serum cholesterol concentrations in this unselected population tended to be higher than those in clinical trials, the percentage reduction was consistent with the trials.
CONCLUSION: The ability of individual statins to lower serum cholesterol concentration varied, with atorvastatin and simvastatin being the most effective. The percentage reductions agreed with those of randomised controlled trials indicating likely benefits in unselected patients in primary care. As the initial serum cholesterol concentrations were higher than those in randomised controlled trials, target serum cholesterol values of < or =5 mmol/l may be unrealistic even for patients taking the most efficacious drugs. Also, the higher initial levels could mean that the absolute reduction in cardiovascular risk in primary care patients is greater than thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12663406      PMCID: PMC152367          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: summary. British Cardiac Society, British Hyperlipidaemia Association, British Hypertension Society, British Diabetic Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-11

2.  General practice workload implications of the national service framework for coronary heart disease: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

3.  Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey.

Authors:  P Primatesta; N R Poulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

4.  A comparison of research general practices and their patients with other practices--a cross-sectional survey in Trent.

Authors:  Vicky Hammersley; Julia Hippisley-Cox; Andrew Wilson; Mike Pringle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Sex inequalities in ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle; N Crown; A Meal; A Wynn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-07

Review 6.  Clinically relevant differences between the statins: implications for therapeutic selection.

Authors:  P H Chong; J D Seeger; C Franklin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators.

Authors:  F M Sacks; M A Pfeffer; L A Moye; J L Rouleau; J D Rutherford; T G Cole; L Brown; J W Warnica; J M Arnold; C C Wun; B R Davis; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-11-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-11-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-07-06       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in general practice: study had two major flaws.

Authors:  Bernard M Y Cheung; Cyrus R Kumana
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-05

2.  Effectiveness of lipid lowering drugs in general practice: article illustrates major problem.

Authors:  Tim W M Wang; Callum A Livingstone; Gordon A Ferns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-05

3.  Recent trends in (under)treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; W M Monique Verschuren; Olaf H Klungel; Anthonius de Boer; Daan Kromhout
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials.

Authors:  Li Wei; Shah Ebrahim; Christopher Bartlett; Peter D Davey; Frank M Sullivan; Thomas M MacDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-24

5.  Effect of statins on the mortality of patients with ischaemic heart disease: population based cohort study with nested case-control analysis.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; C Coupland
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Ineffectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in primary care.

Authors:  E Van Ganse; T Souchet; L Laforest; P Moulin; M Bertrand; P Le Jeunne; N Travier; D Yin; E Alemao; G de Pouvourville
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Meta-analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Bernard M Y Cheung; Ian J Lauder; Chu-Pak Lau; Cyrus R Kumana
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Whom are we treating with lipid-lowering drugs? Are we following the guidelines? Evidence from a population-based study: the Tromso study 2001.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hartz; Anne Elise Eggen; Sameline Grimsgaard; Frode Skjold; Inger Njølstad
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  National Drug Formulary review of statin therapeutic group using the multiattribute scoring tool.

Authors:  Azuana Ramli; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Saperi Sulong; Faridah Aryani Md Yusof
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.