Literature DB >> 12662906

Use of human liver S9 in the Ames test: assay of three procarcinogens using human S9 derived from multiple donors.

Atsushi Hakura1, Satoshi Suzuki, Shigeki Sawada, Tadakazu Sugihara, Yuji Hori, Kanako Uchida, William D Kerns, Fumio Sagami, Satoru Motooka, Tetsuo Satoh.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the inter-individual variation in the mutagenicity of chemicals using a variety of human S9 fractions. For this purpose, three procarcinogens, 2-amino-3-methylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ), benzo[a]pyrene (BP), and dimethylnitrosamine (DMN), were selected for the Ames test and their mutagenicity was examined using human liver S9 fractions prepared from 18 different donors and one pooled liver S9 fraction prepared from 15 different donors. In addition, rat S9 fraction prepared from male rats pretreated with phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone (PB/BF) was used as reference in order to examine the mutagenic differences between human and rat (PB/BF) S9 fractions. The data demonstrate a large inter-individual diversity in the mutagenic response to procarcinogens. The mutagenicity of IQ and BP in the presence of a human liver S9 fraction (lot HLS-014) was equal to that observed in the presence of rat (PB/BF) S9 fraction. The mutagenicity of IQ and BP in the presence of a pooled human liver S9 fraction was lower (90 and 95%, respectively) than that observed in the presence of rat (PB/BF) S9. On the contrary, the mutagenicity of DMN in the presence of either a selected human liver S9 fraction (lot HLS-014) or pooled fraction was 8-fold higher than that found in the presence of rat (PB/BF) S9 fraction. Human liver S9 fraction (lot HLS-014) had one of the highest cytochrome P450 enzyme activities among the 18 different donors and higher than the pooled human liver S9 fraction. These results suggest that the use of both selected human liver S9 fractions with high metabolic activity (e.g., lot HLS-014 as used in this study) and a pooled S9 fraction with moderate metabolic activity could be used as a means to evaluate the inter-individual variability in mutagenic response to chemicals and to confirm positive responses from studies completed with rodent S9. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science (USA)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12662906     DOI: 10.1016/s0273-2300(02)00024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

1.  Signs of deferasirox genotoxicity.

Authors:  Hasan Basri Ila; Mehmet Topaktas; Mehmet Arslan; Mehmet Büyükleyla
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  The Alginate Immobilization of Metabolic Enzymes Platform Retrofits an Estrogen Receptor Transactivation Assay With Metabolic Competence.

Authors:  Chad Deisenroth; Danica E DeGroot; Todd Zurlinden; Andrew Eicher; James McCord; Mi-Young Lee; Paul Carmichael; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  HepGentox: a novel promising HepG2 reportergene-assay for the detection of genotoxic substances in complex mixtures.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Christina Friedl; Alexandra Irnesberger; Thomas Czerny; Tina Piwonka; Alfonso Peñarroya; Manfred Tacker; Elisabeth Riegel
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Assessment by Ames test and comet assay of toxicity potential of polymer used to develop field-capable rapid-detection device to analyze environmental samples.

Authors:  Amanda Hebert; Michelle Bishop; Dhiman Bhattacharyya; Karen Gleason; Stephen Torosian
Journal:  Appl Nanosci       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 5.  Evaluation of the Suitability of Mammalian In Vitro Assays to Assess the Genotoxic Potential of Food Contact Materials.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pinter; Bernhard Rainer; Thomas Czerny; Elisabeth Riegel; Benoît Schilter; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-02-22

6.  Direct Comparison of the Lowest Effect Concentrations of Mutagenic Reference Substances in Two Ames Test Formats.

Authors:  Bernhard Rainer; Elisabeth Pinter; Lukas Prielinger; Chiara Coppola; Maricel Marin-Kuan; Benoit Schilter; Silvia Apprich; Manfred Tacker
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-06-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.