Literature DB >> 12662741

A neural model of the saccade generator in the reticular formation.

Gregory Gancarz1, Stephen Grossberg.   

Abstract

A neural model is developed of the neural circuitry in the reticular formation that is used to generate saccadic eye movements. The model simulates the behavior of identified cell types-such as long-lead burst neurons, short-lead excitatory and inhibitory burst neurons, omnipause neurons, and tonic neurons-under many experimental conditions. Simulated phenomena include: saccade staircases, duration and amplitude of cell discharges for saccades of variable amplitude, component stretching to achieve straight oblique saccades, saturation of saccade velocity after saturation of saccade amplitude in response to high stimulation frequencies, trade-offs between saccade velocity and duration to generate constant saccade amplitude, conservation of saccade amplitude in response to sufficiently brief stimulation of omnipause neurons, and high velocity smooth eye movements evoked by high levels of electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus. Previous saccade generator models have not explained this range of data. These models have also invoked mechanisms for which no neurophysiological evidence has been forthcoming, such as resetable integrators, perfect integrators, or target position movement commands. The present model utilizes only known reticular formation neurons. It suggests that a key part of the feedback loop within the saccade generator is realized by inhibitory feedback from short-lead to long-lead burst neurons, in response to excitatory feedforward signals from long-lead to short-lead burst neurons. When this property is combined with opponent interactions between agonist and antagonist muscle-controlling neurons, and motor error, or vector, inputs from the superior colliculus and other saccade-controlling brain regions, all of the above data can be explained. Taken together, these components generate a saccade reset cycle whereby activation of long-lead burst neurons inhibits omnipause neurons and thereby disinhibits short-lead excitatory burst neurons. The excitatory short-lead burst neurons can then respond to excitatory inputs from the long-lead burst neurons. Outputs from the excitatory short-lead burst neurons are integrated by the tonic cells while they also inhibit the long-lead burst neurons via inhibitory burst interneurons. When this inhibition is complete, the omnipause neurons are disinhibited. The omnipause neurons can then, once again, inhibit the short-lead burst neurons, whose inhibition of the long-lead burst neurons is thereby removed. The saccadic cycle can then begin again. In response to sustained electrical input, this cycle generates a staircase of identical saccades whose properties match the data much better than the staircases proposed by alternative models. A comparative analysis of the hypotheses and predictive capabilities of other saccade generator models is provided.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 12662741     DOI: 10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00096-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Netw        ISSN: 0893-6080


  15 in total

1.  Nonlinear time series analysis of jerk congenital nystagmus.

Authors:  O E Akman; D S Broomhead; R A Clement; R V Abadi
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14

Review 3.  Behavioural and computational varieties of response inhibition in eye movements.

Authors:  Vassilis Cutsuridis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Eye movement instabilities and nystagmus can be predicted by a nonlinear dynamics model of the saccadic system.

Authors:  O E Akman; D S Broomhead; R V Abadi; R A Clement
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Effects of driving time on microsaccadic dynamics.

Authors:  Leandro L Di Stasi; Michael B McCamy; Sebastian Pannasch; Rebekka Renner; Andrés Catena; José J Cañas; Boris M Velichkovsky; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Desirability, availability, credit assignment, category learning, and attention: Cognitive-emotional and working memory dynamics of orbitofrontal, ventrolateral, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2018-05-08

7.  EVALUATION OF VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL SACCADES USING THE DEVELOPMENTAL EYE MOVEMENT TEST COMPARED TO THE KING-DEVICK TEST.

Authors:  John D Heick; Curt Bay; Tamara C Valovich McLeod
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-08

Review 8.  Production, control, and visual guidance of saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  ISRN Neurol       Date:  2013-10-23

9.  A physiological neural controller of a muscle fiber oculomotor plant in horizontal monkey saccades.

Authors:  Alireza Ghahari; John D Enderle
Journal:  ISRN Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-07

10.  Resonant Cholinergic Dynamics in Cognitive and Motor Decision-Making: Attention, Category Learning, and Choice in Neocortex, Superior Colliculus, and Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Jesse Palma; Massimiliano Versace
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.