Literature DB >> 12662164

Normative data of bone mineral density in an unselected adult Austrian population.

S Kudlacek1, B Schneider, M Peterlik, G Leb, K Klaushofer, K Weber, W Woloszczuk, R Willvonseder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that correct interpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) requires a population-specific reference range. We therefore collected data on age-related BMD in a random sample of the normal adult Austrian population to establish an appropriate normative database.
METHODS: We measured BMD by DEXA at five different skeletal sites in 1089 subjects, i.e. 654 females and 435 males, aged between 21-76 years, who had been recruited by 17 centres across Austria.
RESULTS: Age-related bone loss was observed until age 65 years with significant changes at the lumbar spine (r = -0.23), total hip (r = -0.07), trochanter (r = -0.10), femoral neck (r = -0.30) and Ward's triangle (r = -0.40) in the women but only at the femoral neck (r = -0.23) and at Ward's triangle (r = -0.40) in the men. When we calculated T scores from the BMD data of the young normal adult study population and used the T score set points according to the WHO classification of osteopenia and osteoporosis, we found that, depending on the skeletal site measured, 7.6-27.4% of the women and 16-41% of the men in our study group had low bone mass, whereas 0.6-2.7% of the female and 0.2-1.0% of the male study population were osteoporotic. However, osteoporosis was indicated in 4-9-fold more females and 5-15-fold more males when we based our estimates on the normative data provided by the manufacturers of the DEXA systems.
CONCLUSION: Our data underscore the importance of using a population-specific reference range for DEXA measurements to avoid overdiagnosis of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12662164     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2003.01128.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0014-2972            Impact factor:   4.686


  14 in total

1.  Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.

Authors:  M Salleh M Ardawi; Abdulraouf A Maimany; Talal M Bahksh; Hasan A N Nasrat; Waleed A Milaat; Raja M Al-Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone mineral density reference ranges for Australian men: Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  M J Henry; J A Pasco; S Korn; J E Gibson; M A Kotowicz; G C Nicholson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Peak bone mineral density in Vietnamese women.

Authors:  H T T Nguyen; B von Schoultz; D M T Pham; D B Nguyen; Q H Le; D V Nguyen; A L Hirschberg; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Calcium supply, bone mineral density and genetically defined lactose maldigestion in a cohort of elderly men.

Authors:  M Gugatschka; A Hoeller; A Fahrleitner-Pammer; H Dobnig; P Pietschmann; S Kudlacek; B Obermayer-Pietsch
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Intracellular and surface RANKL are differentially regulated in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Daniela Stupphann; Martina Rauner; Dagmar Krenbek; Janina Patsch; Thomas Pirker; Christian Muschitz; Heinrich Resch; Peter Pietschmann
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Infusion of ibandronate once every 3 months effectively decreases bone resorption markers and increases bone mineral density in Chinese postmenopausal osteoporotic women: a 1-year study.

Authors:  Mei Li; Xiao-ping Xing; Zhen-lin Zhang; Jian-li Liu; Zhong-lan Zhang; Dong-gang Liu; Wei-bo Xia; Xun-wu Meng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Do long term survivors of ewing family of tumors experience low bone mineral density and increased fracture risk?

Authors:  Gerhard M Hobusch; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Christoph Krall; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Population-based reference values for bone mineral density in young men.

Authors:  M Høiberg; T L Nielsen; K Wraae; B Abrahamsen; C Hagen; M Andersen; K Brixen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone mineral density in university aged Saudi females.

Authors:  Lina Fahmi Hammad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.088

10.  Large-scale evidence for the effect of the COLIA1 Sp1 polymorphism on osteoporosis outcomes: the GENOMOS study.

Authors:  Stuart H Ralston; André G Uitterlinden; Maria Luisa Brandi; Susana Balcells; Bente L Langdahl; Paul Lips; Roman Lorenc; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Serena Scollen; Mariona Bustamante; Lise Bjerre Husted; Alisoun H Carey; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Alison M Dunning; Alberto Falchetti; Elzbieta Karczmarewicz; Marcin Kruk; Johannes P T M van Leeuwen; Joyce B J van Meurs; Jon Mangion; Fiona E A McGuigan; Leonardo Mellibovsky; Francesca del Monte; Huibert A P Pols; Jonathan Reeve; David M Reid; Wilfried Renner; Fernando Rivadeneira; Natasja M van Schoor; Rachael E Sherlock; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.