Literature DB >> 12659472

The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection.

Mark G Fischman1, David F Stodden, Davana M Lehman.   

Abstract

During a unimanual grip selection task in which people pick up a lightweight dowel and place one end against targets at variable heights, the choice of hand grip (overhand vs. underhand) typically depends on the perception of how comfortable the arm will be at the end of the movement: an end-state comfort effect. The two experiments reported here extend this work to bimanual tasks. In each experiment, 26 right-handed participants used their left and right hands to simultaneously pick up two wooden dowels and place either the right or left end against a series of 14 targets ranging from 14 to 210 cm above the floor. These tasks were performed in systematic ascending and descending orders in Experiment 1 and in random order in Expiment 2. Results were generally consistent with predictions of end-state comfort in that, for the extreme highest and lowest targets, participants tended to select opposite grips with each hand. Taken together, our findings are consistent with the concept of constraint hierarchies within a posture-based motion-planning model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12659472     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  14 in total

1.  Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Christian Seegelke; Paola Reissig; Christoph Schütz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Elizabeth A Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-13

7.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  John M Huhn; Kimberly A Schimpf; Robrecht P van der Wel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.

Authors:  Loes Janssen; Marieke Beuting; Ruud Meulenbroek; Bert Steenbergen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.