Literature DB >> 12658416

Comparison of patient satisfaction after redo and primary fundoplications.

L Khaitan1, P Bhatt, W Richards, H Houston, K Sharp, M Holzman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although much has been written about the results and patient satisfaction with fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, the reports have focused primarily on surgical successes. With the growing number of fundoplications being performed, more patients are requiring reoperation because of recurrent symptoms or side effects. Reports of success rates for reoperation are available, but information regarding patient satisfaction is limited.
METHODS: All the patients undergoing fundoplication at our institution were sent short-form health surveys (SF-12), Gastroesophageal reflux disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaires (QOLRAD), and queries regarding long-term satisfaction.
RESULTS: Between November 1992 and July 2000, 221 patients (198 primary and 23 redo) underwent fundoplication. There were 19 open cases (3 primary and 16 redo). In the primary group, 173 patients underwent Nissen, 23 underwent Toupet, and 2 underwent Collis fundoplications. In the redo group, 12 patients underwent Nissen, 9 underwent Toupet, 1 underwent Collis, and l underwent Belsey fundoplications. Follow-up surveys were completed for 130 patients (112 primary and 18 redo) at a mean of 32.6 months (range, 0.8-98 months). In the primary group, 87% of the patients were satisfied with their operation, as compared with 75% in the redo group. There was a trend toward higher SF-12 mental scores (46 +/- 12 vs 40 +/- 14; p = 0.07) and QOLRAD scores (6.2 +/- 1.3 vs 5.2 +/- 2.0; p = 0.07) in the primary fundoplication group. There was a significant difference in the SF-12 physical scores between the groups (32 +/- 13 for the primary group vs 18.5 +/- 11 for the redo group; p = 0.0002). Additionally, 61% of the patients in the redo group were again using antireflux medications, whereas only 24% of the patients in the primary group were using medications again.
CONCLUSION: Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptom scores and quality-of-life scores for patients undergoing redo fundoplication are lower than the scores of patients having primary fundoplication. Quality of life is similar between primary and redo fundoplication patients in the mental component. However, redo patients do not do as well physically more than 2 years after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12658416     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8846-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic fundoplication failures: patterns of failure and response to fundoplication revision.

Authors:  J G Hunter; C D Smith; G D Branum; J P Waring; T L Trus; M Cornwell; K Galloway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Postfundoplication complications. Prevention and management.

Authors:  J P Waring
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Anatomic fundoplication failure after laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  N J Soper; D Dunnegan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  D A Revicki; M Wood; P N Maton; S Sorensen
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Causes of failures of laparoscopic antireflux operations.

Authors:  B Dallemagne; J M Weerts; C Jehaes; S Markiewicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Is laparoscopic reoperation for failed antireflux surgery feasible?

Authors:  N R Floch; R A Hinder; P J Klingler; S A Branton; M H Seelig; T Bammer; C J Filipi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-07

7.  Laparoscopic refundoplications after failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  R Pointner; T Bammer; P Then; T Kamolz
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Natural history of reflux oesophagitis: a 10 year follow up of its effect on patient symptomatology and quality of life.

Authors:  N I McDougall; B T Johnston; F Kee; J S Collins; R J McFarland; A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Quality of life before and after laparoscopic fundoplication.

Authors:  K Slim; J Bousquet; F Kwiatkowski; G Lescure; D Pezet; J Chipponi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic reoperation following failed antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; G G Jamieson; P A Game; R S Williams; P G Devitt
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Quality of life after collis gastroplasty for short esophagus in patients with paraesophageal hernia.

Authors:  Katie S Nason; James D Luketich; Omar Awais; Ghulam Abbas; Arjun Pennathur; Rodney J Landreneau; Matthew J Schuchert
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Reoperative laparoscopic paraesophageal herniorrhaphy can produce excellent outcomes.

Authors:  Albert W Tsang; Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Chris U Okwuosa; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic redo fundoplication.

Authors:  Lokesh Bathla; Andras Legner; Kazuto Tsuboi; Sumeet Mittal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Post-Nissen Dysphagia and Bloating Syndrome: Outcomes After Conversion to Toupet Fundoplication.

Authors:  Katrin Schwameis; Jörg Zehetner; Kais Rona; Peter Crookes; Nikolai Bildzukewicz; Daniel S Oh; Geoffrey Ro; Katherine Ross; Kulmeet Sandhu; Namir Katkhouda; Jeffrey A Hagen; John C Lipham
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Laparoscopic revision of failed fundoplication and hiatal herniorraphy.

Authors:  Constantine T Frantzides; Atul K Madan; Mark A Carlson; Tallal M Zeni; John G Zografakis; Ronald M Moore; Mick Meiselman; Minh Luu; Georgios D Ayiomamitis
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Causes of dissatisfaction after laparoscopic fundoplication: the impact of new symptoms, recurrent symptoms, and the patient experience.

Authors:  Leigh A Humphries; Jonathan M Hernandez; Whalen Clark; Kenneth Luberice; Sharona B Ross; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic redo fundoplication improves disease-specific and global quality of life following failed laparoscopic or open fundoplication.

Authors:  Sara E Martin Del Campo; Sara A Mansfield; Andrew J Suzo; Jeffrey W Hazey; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Surgical reintervention after failed antireflux surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Edgar J B Furnée; Werner A Draaisma; Ivo A M J Broeders; Hein G Gooszen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes.

Authors:  Craig B Morgenthal; Matthew D Shane; Alessandro Stival; Nana Gletsu; Graham Milam; Vickie Swafford; John G Hunter; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Evaluation of resection of the gastroesophageal junction and jejunal interposition (Merendino procedure) as a rescue procedure in patients with a failed redo antireflux procedure. A single-center experience.

Authors:  Apostolos Analatos; Mats Lindblad; Ioannis Rouvelas; Peter Elbe; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Andrianos Tsekrekos; Jon A Tsai
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.