Literature DB >> 12657179

Correction of large (>25 cm(2)) cranial defects with "reinforced" hydroxyapatite cement: technique and complications.

Susan R Durham1, J Gordon McComb, Michael L Levy.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hydroxyapatite cement is both biocompatible and osteoconductive, and it lacks significant toxic or immunogenic properties, making it an ideal substrate for the repair of cranial defects. However, with its putty-like composition, the repair of large cranial defects can be difficult because significant settling occurs as the cement hardens. We describe a technique in which we use hydroxyapatite cement, reinforced with tantalum mesh and titanium miniplates, for the repair of large (>25 cm(2)) cranial defects.
METHODS: After the margins of the cranioplasty are delineated, tantalum mesh is placed under the edges of the defect. Titanium miniplate single-hole bars are used to criss-cross the defect and are then secured to the surrounding bone with screws. The mesh is secured to the bars with 28-gauge stainless steel wire. Hydroxyapatite cement is applied in the defect and contoured appropriately.
RESULTS: We performed nine cranioplasties in eight patients ranging in age from 1.5 to 35 years (mean, 12.2 +/- 10.1 yr). The reasons for cranioplasty included cranial defect from prior trauma (n = 4), fibrous dysplasia (n = 2), infected bone flaps (n = 2), and tumor (n = 1). The cranioplasties ranged in size from 40 to 196 cm(2) (mean, 128.3 +/- 56.9 cm(2)). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 33 months (mean, 11.4 +/- 12.8 mo). Two cranioplasty constructs were removed at 1 and 3 months postoperatively owing to infection.
CONCLUSION: The use of hydroxyapatite cement with mesh and miniplates provides internal structural support and increased stability of the construct. Although this technique provides an excellent cosmetic result and no evidence to date of bony resorption, the rate of infection is alarmingly high in these large constructs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657179     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000054220.01290.8e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  16 in total

Review 1.  The Recent Revolution in the Design and Manufacture of Cranial Implants: Modern Advancements and Future Directions.

Authors:  David J Bonda; Sunil Manjila; Warren R Selman; David Dean
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Elizabeth J Volpicelli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Hydrogels That Allow and Facilitate Bone Repair, Remodeling, and Regeneration.

Authors:  Aaron R Short; Deepthi Koralla; Ameya Deshmukh; Benjamin Wissel; Benjamin Stocker; Mark Calhoun; David Dean; Jessica O Winter
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 6.331

5.  Apatite-coated silk fibroin scaffolds to healing mandibular border defects in canines.

Authors:  Jun Zhao; Zhiyuan Zhang; Shaoyi Wang; Xiaojuan Sun; Xiuli Zhang; Jake Chen; David L Kaplan; Xinquan Jiang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Mandibular repair in rats with premineralized silk scaffolds and BMP-2-modified bMSCs.

Authors:  Xinquan Jiang; Jun Zhao; Shaoyi Wang; Xiaojuan Sun; Xiuli Zhang; Jake Chen; David L Kaplan; Zhiyuan Zhang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Catcher's mask cranioplasty for extensive cranial defects in children with an open head trauma: a novel application of partial cranioplasty.

Authors:  Ichiro Takumi; Masataka Akimoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Reconstruction of a large complex skull defect in a child: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ricardo Santos de Oliveira; Rodrigo Brigato; João Flávio Gurjão Madureira; Antonio Augusto Velasco Cruz; Francisco Veríssimo de Mello Filho; Nivaldo Alonso; Helio Rubens Machado
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Verifying three-dimensional skull model reconstruction using cranial index of symmetry.

Authors:  Woon-Man Kung; Shuo-Tsung Chen; Chung-Hsiang Lin; Yu-Mei Lu; Tzu-Hsuan Chen; Muh-Shi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Simultaneous cranioplasty and subdural-peritoneal shunting for contralateral symptomatic subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Muh-Shi Lin; Tzu-Hsuan Chen; Woon-Man Kung; Shuo-Tsung Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.