Literature DB >> 12656397

Auditory spatial discrimination by barn owls in simulated echoic conditions.

Matthew W Spitzer1, Avinash D S Bala, Terry T Takahashi.   

Abstract

In humans, directional hearing in reverberant conditions is characterized by a "precedence effect," whereby directional information conveyed by leading sounds dominates perceived location, and listeners are relatively insensitive to directional information conveyed by lagging sounds. Behavioral studies provide evidence of precedence phenomena in a wide range of species. The present study employs a discrimination paradigm, based on habituation and recovery of the pupillary dilation response, to provide quantitative measures of precedence phenomena in the barn owl. As in humans, the owl's ability to discriminate changes in the location of lagging sources is impaired relative to that for single sources. Spatial discrimination of lead sources is also impaired, but to a lesser extent than discrimination of lagging sources. Results of a control experiment indicate that sensitivity to monaural cues cannot account for discrimination of lag source location. Thus, impairment of discrimination ability in the two-source conditions most likely reflects a reduction in sensitivity to binaural directional information. These results demonstrate a similarity of precedence effect phenomena in barn owls and humans, and provide a basis for quantitative comparison with neuronal data from the same species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12656397     DOI: 10.1121/1.1548152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific adaptation: can it be a neural correlate of behavioral habituation?

Authors:  Shai Netser; Yael Zahar; Yoram Gutfreund
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Can measures of sound localization acuity be related to the precision of absolute location estimates?

Authors:  Jordan M Moore; Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Short-latency, goal-directed movements of the pinnae to sounds that produce auditory spatial illusions.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Elizabeth M McClaine; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

6.  Behavior and modeling of two-dimensional precedence effect in head-unrestrained cats.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Janet L Ruhland; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatial hearing in echoic environments: the role of the envelope in owls.

Authors:  Brian S Nelson; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  The role of envelope shape in the localization of multiple sound sources and echoes in the barn owl.

Authors:  Caitlin S Baxter; Brian S Nelson; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Optimal nonlinear cue integration for sound localization.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Jose Luis Peña
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.