Literature DB >> 12656296

Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk.

Neil Stewart1, Nick Chater, Henry P Stott, Stian Reimers.   

Abstract

In many theories of decision under risk (e.g., expected utility theory, rank-dependent utility theory, and prospect theory), the utility of a prospect is independent of other options in the choice set. The experiments presented here show a large effect of the available options, suggesting instead that prospects are valued relative to one another. The judged certainty equivalent for a prospect is strongly influenced by the options available. Similarly, the selection of a preferred prospect is strongly influenced by the prospects available. Alternative theories of decision under risk (e.g., the stochastic difference model, multialternative decision field theory, and range frequency theory), where prospects are valued relative to one another, can provide an account of these context effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12656296     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  20 in total

1.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A similarity-based range-frequency model for two-category rating data.

Authors:  Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

3.  Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.

Authors:  Mehran Spitmaan; Emily Chu; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A Bayesian model of context-sensitive value attribution.

Authors:  Francesco Rigoli; Karl J Friston; Cristina Martinelli; Mirjana Selaković; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.

Authors:  Mel W Khaw; Paul W Glimcher; Kenway Louie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Do humans make good decisions?

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Distributions of observed death tolls govern sensitivity to human fatalities.

Authors:  Christopher Y Olivola; Namika Sagara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Interpersonal comparison of subjective probabilities: toward translating linguistic probabilities.

Authors:  Mandeep K Dhami; Thomas S Wallsten
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

9.  Building Bridges between Perceptual and Economic Decision-Making: Neural and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Konstantinos Tsetsos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The non-existence of risk attitude.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Petter Johansson; Lars Hall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.