Literature DB >> 12654757

Teicoplanin therapeutic drug monitoring in critically ill patients: a retrospective study emphasizing the importance of a loading dose.

Federico Pea1, Loris Brollo, Pierluigi Viale, Federica Pavan, Mario Furlanut.   

Abstract

Data obtained as part of our routine drug monitoring of teicoplanin therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring, TDM) in adult critically ill patients being treated for suspected or documented Gram-positive multiresistant infections were assessed, retrospectively. Data were available for 202 patients (146 male, 56 female; age 58 +/- 16 years) with a total number of 829 teicoplanin trough plasma levels (C(min)) assessed. The percentage of patients with adequate teicoplanin concentrations (C(min) >/= 10 mg/L) during the treatment period substantially increased from 3.2% on day 2, to 35%, 70%, 90% and approximately 95% on days 4, 7, 11 and 15, respectively. The findings suggest that optimal teicoplanin therapy was achieved only after at least 4, and probably 7, days of therapy in most cases, mainly because of a failure to use an appropriate loading dose. Among the possible causes for the reluctance to use a loading dose, concern over the potential nephrotoxicity of teicoplanin was a major factor. We conclude that loading doses of teicoplanin (6 mg/kg every 12 h for at least three doses) must be considered mandatory in all patients, regardless of their renal function, to enable optimal drug concentrations to be achieved early in the treatment period. Subsequently, TDM is important to ensure that dose regimens are optimized to the individual requirements of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654757     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkg147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  24 in total

1.  Randomized comparison of serum teicoplanin concentrations following daily or alternate daily dosing in healthy adults.

Authors:  Bernard Rouveix; François Jehl; Henri Drugeon; Ivan Brumpt; Evelyne Caulin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Ross Norris; David L Paterson; Jennifer H Martin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Vancomycin vs teicoplanin in the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a Turkish University Hospital.

Authors:  Aylin Acar Sancar; Selen Yegenoglu; Robin de Vries; Maarten J Postma; Nimet Simsek; Petros Pechlivanoglou; Serhat Unal
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2008-09-21

5.  Enhanced loading regimen of teicoplanin is necessary to achieve therapeutic pharmacokinetics levels for the improvement of clinical outcomes in patients with renal dysfunction.

Authors:  T Ueda; Y Takesue; K Nakajima; K Ichiki; A Doita; Y Wada; T Tsuchida; Y Takahashi; M Ishihara; H Ikeuchi; M Uchino; T Kimura
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Teicoplanin dosing strategy for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in Korean patients with neutropenic fever.

Authors:  Byung-Jin Ahn; Dong-Seok Yim; Dong-Gun Lee; Jae-Cheol Kwon; Si-Hyun Kim; Su-Mi Choi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 7.  Total Syntheses of Vancomycin-Related Glycopeptide Antibiotics and Key Analogues.

Authors:  Akinori Okano; Nicholas A Isley; Dale L Boger
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Teicoplanin in patients with acute leukaemia and febrile neutropenia: a special population benefiting from higher dosages.

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale; Anna Candoni; Federica Pavan; Leonardo Pagani; Daniela Damiani; Marco Casini; Mario Furlanut
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Antonello Di Paolo; Giovanni Gori; Carlo Tascini; Romano Danesi; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: Appropriate antibiotic therapy in severe sepsis and septic shock--does the dose matter?

Authors:  Federico Pea; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.