Literature DB >> 12654694

mecA-blaZ corepressors in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Adriana E Rosato1, Barry N Kreiswirth, William A Craig, William Eisner, Michael W Climo, Gordon L Archer.   

Abstract

The presence and nucleotide sequences of the two mecA repressors, mecI and blaI, were assessed in 73 clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Isolates with mecI mutations were grouped into unique clonal types based on their spa nucleotide repeat patterns. Forty-three of the 45 (96%) isolates with mutant mecI or with a deletion of mecI contained blaI, while blaI was present in only 21 of 28 (78%) isolates with wild-type mecI (P < 0.05). Among 22 additional isolates that did not contain blaI, all had wild-type mecI sequences. We conclude that oxacillin-resistant S. aureus must have at least one of the two functional mecA regulators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12654694      PMCID: PMC152515          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.47.4.1460-1463.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  Studies of the repressor (BlaI) of beta-lactamase synthesis in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P D Gregory; R A Lewis; S P Curnock; K G Dyke
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Correlation between regulation of mecA transcription and expression of methicillin resistance in staphylococci.

Authors:  C Ryffel; F H Kayser; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Molecular evolution of MRSA.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.955

4.  Role of mecA transcriptional regulation in the phenotypic expression of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D M Niemeyer; M J Pucci; J A Thanassi; V K Sharma; G L Archer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Determination of the chromosomal relationship between mecA and gyrA in methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  P D Fey; M W Climo; G L Archer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Mechanisms of heteroresistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Ryffel; A Strässle; F H Kayser; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Characterization of IS1272, an insertion sequence-like element from Staphylococcus haemolyticus.

Authors:  G L Archer; J A Thanassi; D M Niemeyer; M J Pucci
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Distribution of mec regulator genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus clinical strains.

Authors:  E Suzuki; K Kuwahara-Arai; J F Richardson; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Constitutive penicillinase formation in Staphylococcus aureus owing to a mutation unlinked to the penicillinase plasmid.

Authors:  S Cohen; H M Sweeney
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Dissemination among staphylococci of DNA sequences associated with methicillin resistance.

Authors:  G L Archer; D M Niemeyer; J A Thanassi; M J Pucci
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Franklin D Lowy
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Antibiotic resistance assessment in S. aureus strains isolated from raw sheep's milk cheese.

Authors:  V Spanu; S Virdis; C Scarano; F Cossu; E P L De Santis; A M Cosseddu
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 3.  Penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jennifer Fishovitz; Juan A Hermoso; Mayland Chang; Shahriar Mobashery
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.885

4.  Laser light combined with a photosensitizer may eliminate methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Khalil I Hajim; Dhuha S Salih; Yasemin Z Rassam
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Identification and phenotypic characterization of a beta-lactam-dependent, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain.

Authors:  Fred Goldstein; Jiri Perutka; Arabela Cuirolo; Konrad Plata; Diego Faccone; Joanne Morris; Aude Sournia; Marie Dominique Kitzis; Aicha Ly; Gordon Archer; Adriana E Rosato
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Development of homogeneous expression of resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains is functionally associated with a beta-lactam-mediated SOS response.

Authors:  Arabela Cuirolo; Konrad Plata; Adriana E Rosato
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 7.  Acquired inducible antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Scott T Chancey; Dorothea Zähner; David S Stephens
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.165

8.  Jumping the barrier to beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yuki Katayama; Hong-Zhong Zhang; Dong Hong; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Quantitation of mecA transcription in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Adriana E Rosato; William A Craig; Gordon L Archer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Methicillin-resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is not affected by the overexpression in trans of the mecA gene repressor: a surprising observation.

Authors:  Duarte C Oliveira; Hermínia de Lencastre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.