PURPOSE: Lung tumors located in the lower lobe are the most mobile. Multiple computed tomographic (CT) scans, which had been performed for radiotherapy planning, were analyzed to determine the minimal number of required scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six spiral CT scans (3 rapid and 3 slow) from 7 such patients were coregistered. Reproducibility of target volumes was defined as the ratio between the overlapping and encompassing volume (COM/SUM) from scans derived using one technique. Volumetric and dosimetric analyses were performed. RESULTS: Slow CT scans generated larger and more reproducible target volumes than rapid planning scans, with a mean COM/SUM ratio of 71.9 +/- 8.7% and 58.0 +/- 12.7%, respectively. When only a single slow CT scan was used for planning, the addition of a symmetrical 3D margin of 5 mm ensured 99% coverage of the "optimal" target volume, which was derived from summation of target volumes from all six scans. CONCLUSION: Planning target volumes (PTVs) derived from a single slow CT scan plus a 5-mm margin covered the "optimal" PTVs generated from six scans. Although these "slow PTVs" were larger, the increase in V(20) (the volume of lung tissue receiving a dose > or = 20 Gy) was limited. This indicates that only two CT scans, i.e., a full rapid scan of the entire thorax and a limited slow scan, are necessary for treatment planning in peripheral lung cancers.
PURPOSE:Lung tumors located in the lower lobe are the most mobile. Multiple computed tomographic (CT) scans, which had been performed for radiotherapy planning, were analyzed to determine the minimal number of required scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six spiral CT scans (3 rapid and 3 slow) from 7 such patients were coregistered. Reproducibility of target volumes was defined as the ratio between the overlapping and encompassing volume (COM/SUM) from scans derived using one technique. Volumetric and dosimetric analyses were performed. RESULTS: Slow CT scans generated larger and more reproducible target volumes than rapid planning scans, with a mean COM/SUM ratio of 71.9 +/- 8.7% and 58.0 +/- 12.7%, respectively. When only a single slow CT scan was used for planning, the addition of a symmetrical 3D margin of 5 mm ensured 99% coverage of the "optimal" target volume, which was derived from summation of target volumes from all six scans. CONCLUSION: Planning target volumes (PTVs) derived from a single slow CT scan plus a 5-mm margin covered the "optimal" PTVs generated from six scans. Although these "slow PTVs" were larger, the increase in V(20) (the volume of lung tissue receiving a dose > or = 20 Gy) was limited. This indicates that only two CT scans, i.e., a full rapid scan of the entire thorax and a limited slow scan, are necessary for treatment planning in peripheral lung cancers.
Authors: J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr Journal: Radiologe Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Juliane Szkitsak; Andre Karius; Christian Hofmann; Rainer Fietkau; Christoph Bert; Stefan Speer Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Jason K Molitoris; Tejan Diwanji; James W Snider; Sina Mossahebi; Santanu Samanta; Shahed N Badiyan; Charles B Simone; Pranshu Mohindra Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: José Bea-Gilabert; M Carmen Baños-Capilla; M Ángeles García-Martínez; Enrique López-Muñoz; Luis M Larrea-Rabassa Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2019
Authors: Seong Soon Jang; Gil Ja Huh; Suk Young Park; Po Song Yang; Hae Nam Chung; Jae Hyuk Seo; Ji Chan Park; Young Jun Yang; Eun Youn Cho Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-05-02 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Sandeep Hunjan; George Starkschall; Isaac Rosen; Karl Prado; Naresh Tolani; Peter Balter Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 2.102