BACKGROUND: The present study is the first instance of patients having been questioned on the criteria applied in their decision for therapy with lingual brackets and on the sources of information available to them within the framework of an international comparison prior to the start of therapy by means of a standardized questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 68 patients (19 male, 49 female; mean age 32.4 years, range 19.8 to 60.0 years, SD 9.7) were interviewed. RESULTS: Therapy with lingual brackets was more important to the patients in the present study for professional than for private reasons: The further the patients were from the typical "braces age", the more important was treatment with an invisible appliance from the professional standpoint. The patients' educational level had no influence on the decision for a fixed lingual appliance. There was no significant difference between the German and the French patients in the decision-making criteria of adult patients and the sources of information available to them in the context of the lingual technique. CONCLUSION: The information available through the media on the lingual technique is inadequate in both countries.
BACKGROUND: The present study is the first instance of patients having been questioned on the criteria applied in their decision for therapy with lingual brackets and on the sources of information available to them within the framework of an international comparison prior to the start of therapy by means of a standardized questionnaire. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 68 patients (19 male, 49 female; mean age 32.4 years, range 19.8 to 60.0 years, SD 9.7) were interviewed. RESULTS: Therapy with lingual brackets was more important to the patients in the present study for professional than for private reasons: The further the patients were from the typical "braces age", the more important was treatment with an invisible appliance from the professional standpoint. The patients' educational level had no influence on the decision for a fixed lingual appliance. There was no significant difference between the German and the French patients in the decision-making criteria of adult patients and the sources of information available to them in the context of the lingual technique. CONCLUSION: The information available through the media on the lingual technique is inadequate in both countries.
Authors: Luca Lombardo; Antonella Carlucci; Mario Palone; Francesco Mollica; Giuseppe Siciliani Journal: Prog Orthod Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 2.750