Literature DB >> 12648801

MR imaging at high magnetic fields.

Masaya Takahashi1, Hidemasa Uematsu, Hiroto Hatabu.   

Abstract

Recently, more investigators have been applying higher magnetic field strengths (3-4 Tesla) in research and clinical settings. Higher magnetic field strength is expected to afford higher spatial resolution and/or a decrease in the length of total scan time due to its higher signal intensity. Besides MR signal intensity, however, there are several factors which are magnetic field dependent, thus the same set of imaging parameters at lower magnetic field strengths would provide differences in signal or contrast to noise ratios at 3 T or higher. Therefore, an outcome of the combined effect of all these factors should be considered to estimate the change in usefulness at different magnetic fields. The objective of this article is to illustrate the practical scientific applications, focusing on MR imaging, of higher magnetic field strength. First, we will discuss previous literature and our experiments to demonstrate several changes that lead to a number of practical applications in MR imaging, e.g. in relaxation times, effects of contrast agent, design of RF coils, maintaining a safety profile and in switching magnetic field strength. Second, we discuss what will be required to gain the maximum benefit of high magnetic field when the current magnetic field (< or = 1.5 T) is switched to 3 or 4 T. In addition, we discuss MR microscopy, which is one of the anticipated applications of high magnetic field strength to understand the quantitative estimation of the gain benefit and other considerations to help establish a practically available imaging protocol. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648801     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00331-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  21 in total

1.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Prostate MR imaging at high-field strength: evolution or revolution?

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Robert P Hartman; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-09-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High-resolution black-blood MRI of the carotid vessel wall using phased-array coils at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Seshasailaja Anumula; Hee Kwon Song; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Eye imaging with a 3.0-T MRI using a surface coil--a study on volunteers and initial patients with uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Arne-Jörn Lemke; Minouche Alai-Omid; Susanne Anja Hengst; Iris Kazi; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Insights into the gyrification of developing ferret brain by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jason Neal; Masaya Takahashi; Matthew Silva; Grace Tiao; Christopher A Walsh; Volney L Sheen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Safety concerns related to magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Amanda K Andriola Silva; Erica L Silva; E Sócrates T Egito; Artur S Carriço
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Optimal 3-T MRI for depiction of the finger A2 pulley: comparison between T1-weighted, fat-saturated T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T1-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Vasco Goncalves-Matoso; Daniel Guntern; Anne Gray; Pierre Schnyder; Carmen Picht; Nicolas Theumann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Rainald Bachmann; Ralf Reilmann; Wolfram Schwindt; Harald Kugel; Walter Heindel; Stefan Krämer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Adaptations in trabecular bone microarchitecture in Olympic athletes determined by 7T MRI.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; S Kubilay Pakin; Mark E Schweitzer; Punam K Saha; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  High resolution MRI anatomy of the cat brain at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Heather L Gray-Edwards; Nouha Salibi; Eleanor M Josephson; Judith A Hudson; Nancy R Cox; Ashley N Randle; Victoria J McCurdy; Allison M Bradbury; Diane U Wilson; Ronald J Beyers; Thomas S Denney; Douglas R Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.