Literature DB >> 12648074

A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of life.

Eva Hellström-Lindberg1, Nina Gulbrandsen, Greger Lindberg, Tomas Ahlgren, Inger Marie S Dahl, Ingunn Dybedal, Gunnar Grimfors, Eva Hesse-Sundin, Martin Hjorth, Lena Kanter-Lewensohn, Olle Linder, Michaela Luthman, Eva Löfvenberg, Gunnar Oberg, Anja Porwit-MacDonald, Anders Rådlund, Jan Samuelsson, Jon Magnus Tangen, Ingemar Winquist, Finn Wisloff.   

Abstract

We have published previously a prototype of a decision model for anaemic patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), in which transfusion need and serum erythropoietin (S-Epo) were used to define three groups with different probabilities of erythroid response to treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) + Epo. S-Epo </= 500 U/l and a transfusion need of < 2 units/month predicted a high probability of response to treatment, S-Epo > 500 U/l and >/= 2 units/month for a poor response, whereas the presence of only one negative prognostic marker predicted an intermediate response. A total of 53 patients from a prospective study were included in our evaluation sample. Patients with good or intermediate probability of response were treated with G-CSF + Epo. The overall response rate was 42% with 28.3% achieving a complete and 13.2% a partial response to treatment. The response rates were 61% and 14% in the good and intermediate predictive groups respectively. The model retained a significant predictive value in the evaluation sample (P < 0.001). Median duration of response was 23 months. Scores for global health and quality of life (QOL) were significantly lower in MDS patients than in a reference population, and fatigue and dyspnoea was significantly more prominent. Global QOL improved in patients responding to treatment (P = 0.01). The validated decision model defined a subgroup of patients with a response rate of 61% (95% confidence interval 48-74%) to treatment with G-CSF + Epo. The majority of these patients have shown complete and durable responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12648074     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  90 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing therapy for iron overload in the myelodysplastic syndromes: recent developments.

Authors:  Heather A Leitch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Withdrawing medically futile treatment.

Authors:  Dianna S Howard; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Somatic activation of a conditional KrasG12D allele causes ineffective erythropoiesis in vivo.

Authors:  Benjamin S Braun; Joehleen A Archard; Jessica A G Van Ziffle; David A Tuveson; Tyler E Jacks; Kevin Shannon
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Phase 2 study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) with or without erythropoietin in heavily transfusion-dependent IPSS low or int-1 MDS patients.

Authors:  U Platzbecker; H K Al-Ali; N Gattermann; D Haase; V Janzen; J Krauter; K Götze; R Schlenk; F Nolte; A Letsch; O G Ottmann; A Kündgen; M Lübbert; U Germing; M Wermke; H Reinhard; C Weiss; K Lieder; G Ehninger; O Leismann; A Giagounidis
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials.

Authors:  U Platzbecker; P Fenaux; L Adès; A Giagounidis; V Santini; A A van de Loosdrecht; D Bowen; T de Witte; G Garcia-Manero; E Hellström-Lindberg; U Germing; R Stauder; L Malcovati; Mikkael A Sekeres; David P Steensma; S Gloaguen
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Evaluation of beta globin mRNA as an early marker of haemoglobin response to epoetin treatment.

Authors:  Gunnar Birgegård; Fredrik Dahl; Bengt Glimelius; Ulf Landegren
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Characteristics of US patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: results of six cross-sectional physician surveys.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; W Marieke Schoonen; Hagop Kantarjian; Alan List; Jon Fryzek; Ronald Paquette; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Daily practice management of myelodysplastic syndromes in France: data from 907 patients in a one-week cross-sectional study by the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies.

Authors:  Charikleia Kelaidi; Aspasia Stamatoullas; Odile Beyne-Rauzy; Emmanuel Raffoux; Bruno Quesnel; Agnes Guerci; François Dreyfus; Sabine Brechignac; Christian Berthou; Thomas Prebet; Yosr Hicheri; Maya Hacini; Jacques Delaunay; Marie-Pierre Gourin; Jean-Marie Camo; Hacene Zerazhi; Anne-Laure Taksin; Laurence Legros; Bachra Choufi; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 9.  Defining prior therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes and criteria for relapsed and refractory disease: implications for clinical trial design and enrollment.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; David P Steensma
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  [Individualized management and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes].

Authors:  Reinhard Stauder; Friedrich Wimazal; Thomas Nösslinger; Otto Krieger; Wolfgang R Sperr; Heinz Sill; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Peter Valent
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.