Literature DB >> 12647900

Kinematic analyses of speech, orofacial nonspeech, and finger movements in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.

Ludo Max1, Anthony J Caruso, Vincent L Gracco.   

Abstract

This work investigated the hypothesis that neuromotor differences between individuals who stutter and individuals who do not stutter are not limited to the movements involved in speech production. Kinematic data were obtained from gender- and age-matched stuttering (n = 10) and nonstuttering (n = 10) adults during speech movements, orofacial nonspeech movements, and finger movements. All movements were performed in 4 conditions differing in sequence length and location of the target movement within the sequence. Results revealed statistically significant differences between the stuttering and nonstuttering individuals on several measures of lip and jaw closing (but not opening) movements during perceptually fluent speech. The magnitude of these differences varied across different levels of utterance length (larger differences during shorter utterances) and across different locations of the target movement within an utterance (larger differences close to the beginning). Results further revealed statistically significant differences between the stuttering and nonstuttering groups in finger flexion (but not extension) movement duration and peak velocity latency. Overall, findings suggest that differences between stuttering and nonstuttering individuals are not confined to the sensorimotor processes underlying speech production or even movements of the orofacial system in general. Rather, it appears that the groups show generalized differences in the duration of certain goal-directed movements across unrelated motor systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647900     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/017)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  32 in total

1.  Correlation of orofacial speeds with voice acoustic measures in the fluent speech of persons who stutter.

Authors:  Michael D McClean; Stephen M Tasko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Basic parameters of articulatory movements and acoustics in individuals with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Bridget Walsh; Anne Smith
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 10.338

3.  Accuracy and precision of a custom camera-based system for 2-d and 3-d motion tracking during speech and nonspeech motor tasks.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A study of the reproducibility and etiology of diffusion anisotropy differences in developmental stuttering: a potential role for impaired myelination.

Authors:  M D Cykowski; P T Fox; R J Ingham; J C Ingham; D A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Evidence of left inferior frontal-premotor structural and functional connectivity deficits in adults who stutter.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Barry Horwitz; John Ostuni; Richard Reynolds; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

8.  Phonation interval modification and speech performance quality during fluency-inducing conditions by adults who stutter.

Authors:  Roger J Ingham; Anne K Bothe; Yuedong Wang; Krystal Purkhiser; Anneliese New
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Evidence That Bimanual Motor Timing Performance Is Not a Significant Factor in Developmental Stuttering.

Authors:  Allison I Hilger; Howard Zelaznik; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Sentence position and syntactic complexity of stuttering in early childhood: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Anthony Buhr; Patricia Zebrowski
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.