Literature DB >> 12647152

Positive interactions between migrant and resident birds: testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis.

Robert L Thomson1, Jukka T Forsman, Mikko Mönkkönen.   

Abstract

We experimentally tested the conditions where heterospecific attraction is more likely to occur. The heterospecific attraction hypothesis predicts that colonizing or migrant individuals use the presence of resident species as a cue for profitable breeding sites. In other words, increasing resident densities will result in increased migrant densities until the costs of interspecific competition override the benefits of heterospecific attraction. The experiment consisted of a reference and a manipulation year. In the reference year, resident titmice were permitted to breed at intermediate densities whilst in the manipulation year, resident densities were manipulated in nine study plots. Three treatments were performed as low, intermediate and high resident densities and migrant density responses were measured in both years. Relative between-year migrant and resident densities were analyzed by regression analysis. Migrant foliage gleaning guild densities responded linearly and positively, as did densities of habitat generalists, in particular Chaffinch ( Fringilla coelebs),. The ground-foraging guild did not show a response. This study provides support for predictions of the heterospecific attraction hypothesis and suggests that information on habitat quality with reference to both food availability and safe breeding sites are important in using heterospecifics as cues. Based on Chaffinch response data, artificially increased resident densities were not high enough for competitive effects between residents and migrants to decrease heterospecific attraction. It seems unlikely that in northern environments natural resident densities will reach high levels where competitive effects would occur, therefore heterospecific attraction will always be beneficial. This study again shows the importance of heterospecific attraction in migrant habitat selection and as a process promoting species diversity in northern breeding bird assemblages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12647152     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-002-1140-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Testing the relative importance of positive and negative effects on community structure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Positive fitness consequences of interspecific interaction with a potential competitor.

Authors:  J T Forsman; J -T Seppänen; M Mönkkönen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The effects of conspecific attraction and habitat quality on habitat selection in territorial birds (Troglodytes aedon).

Authors:  K L Muller; J A Stamps; V V Krishnan; N H Willits
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Positive interactions in communities.

Authors:  M D Bertness; R Callaway
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Behavioural constraints and conservation biology: Conspecific attraction and recruitment.

Authors:  J M Reed; A P Dobson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communites?

Authors:  Mikko Mönkkönen; Pekka Helle; Kimmo Soppela
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest.

Authors:  Jukka T Forsman; Mikko Mönkkönen; Pekka Helle; Jouko Inkeröinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Geographical gradients of stability in European land bird communities.

Authors:  Olli Järvinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Density dependent effects between three competitive bird species.

Authors:  L Sasvári; J Török; L Tóth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment.

Authors:  Johan Elmberg; Hannu Pöysä; Kjell Sjöberg; Petri Nummi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  12 in total

1.  Testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis with time-series data on species co-occurrence.

Authors:  Esther Sebastián-González; José Antonio Sánchez-Zapata; Francisco Botella; Otso Ovaskainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  New behavioural trait adopted or rejected by observing heterospecific tutor fitness.

Authors:  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen; Jukka T Forsman; Mikko Mönkkönen; Indrikis Krams; Tuuli Salmi
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The increased risk of predation enhances cooperation.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Arnis Bērziņs; Tatjana Krama; David Wheatcroft; Kristīne Igaune; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Breeding near heterospecifics as a defence against brood parasites: can redstarts lower probability of cuckoo parasitism using neighbours?

Authors:  Angela Moreras; Jere Tolvanen; Risto Tornberg; Mikko Mönkkönen; Jukka T Forsman; Robert L Thomson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.298

5.  Settlement decisions in blue tits: difference in the use of social information according to age and individual success.

Authors:  Deseada Parejo; Joel White; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-05-09

6.  Species partitioning in a temperate mountain chain: Segregation by habitat vs. interspecific competition.

Authors:  Giulia Bastianelli; Brendan A Wintle; Elizabeth H Martin; Javier Seoane; Paola Laiolo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Local Community Composition Drives Avian Borrelia burgdorferi Infection and Tick Infestation.

Authors:  Marie Lilly; Wilmer Amaya-Mejia; Lucas Pavan; Ceili Peng; Arielle Crews; Nghia Tran; Ravinder Sehgal; Andrea Swei
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

8.  Habitat selection, facilitation, and biotic settlement cues affect distribution and performance of coral recruits in French Polynesia.

Authors:  Nichole Price
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Settling decisions and heterospecific social information use in shrikes.

Authors:  Martin Hromada; Marcin Antczak; Thomas J Valone; Piotr Tryjanowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Conspecific and heterospecific cues override resource quality to influence offspring production.

Authors:  Christine W Miller; Robert J Fletcher; Stephanie R Gillespie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.