Literature DB >> 35978228

Breeding near heterospecifics as a defence against brood parasites: can redstarts lower probability of cuckoo parasitism using neighbours?

Angela Moreras1, Jere Tolvanen2, Risto Tornberg2, Mikko Mönkkönen3,4, Jukka T Forsman2,5, Robert L Thomson6,7.   

Abstract

Breeding habitat choice based on the attraction to other species can provide valuable social information and protection benefits. In birds, species with overlapping resources can be a cue of good quality habitats; species with shared predators and/or brood parasites can increase joint vigilance or cooperative mobbing, while raptors may provide a protective umbrella against these threats. We tested whether the migratory common redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) is attracted to breed near active nests of the great tit (Parus major), a keystone-information source for migrant passerine birds, or a top predator, the northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis). This system is unique to test these questions because the redstart is a regular host for the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Therefore, we also evaluated other possible benefits coming from the heterospecific attraction, especially in terms of reducing brood parasitism risk. We monitored redstart occupancy rates, onset of breeding, reproductive investment, and followed nest outcomes in terms of brood parasitism, nest predation risk and overall reproductive success. Redstarts avoided breeding near goshawks, but showed neither attraction nor avoidance to breed next to great tits. Both neighbours neither reduced brood parasitism risk nor affected overall nesting success in redstarts. Redstarts may not use heterospecific attraction for settlement decisions, as associations with other species can only exist when some benefits are gained. Thus, environmental cues may be more important than social information for redstarts when breeding habitat choice. Other front-line defence strategies may have a better impact reducing breeding negative interactions, such brood parasitism.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frontline defence; Heterospecific attraction; Interspecific interaction; Nest-site choice; Reproductive success

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35978228     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05242-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  17 in total

Review 1.  Public information: from nosy neighbors to cultural evolution.

Authors:  Etienne Danchin; Luc-Alain Giraldeau; Thomas J Valone; Richard H Wagner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Brood parasitism and the evolution of cooperative breeding in birds.

Authors:  W E Feeney; I Medina; M Somveille; R Heinsohn; M L Hall; R A Mulder; J A Stein; R M Kilner; N E Langmore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Protective association and breeding advantages of choughs nesting in lesser kestrel colonies

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communites?

Authors:  Mikko Mönkkönen; Pekka Helle; Kimmo Soppela
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest.

Authors:  Jukka T Forsman; Mikko Mönkkönen; Pekka Helle; Jouko Inkeröinen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Temporal Variation in Danger Drives Antipredator Behavior: The Predation Risk Allocation Hypothesis.

Authors:  Steven L Lima; Peter A Bednekoff
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Costs of breeding far away from neighbors: Isolated host nests are more vulnerable to cuckoo parasitism.

Authors:  Laikun Ma; Canchao Yang; Jianping Liu; Jianwei Zhang; Wei Liang; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Predation as a landscape effect: the trading off by prey species between predation risks and protection benefits.

Authors:  M Mönkkönen; M Husby; R Tornberg; P Helle; R L Thomson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Climate change can alter competitive relationships between resident and migratory birds.

Authors:  Markus P Ahola; Toni Laaksonen; Tapio Eeva; Esa Lehikoinen
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Public information and breeding habitat selection in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Blandine Doligez; Etienne Danchin; Jean Clobert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.