Literature DB >> 12646509

Induced abortion, miscarriage, and breast cancer risk of young women.

Maya Mahue-Giangreco1, Giske Ursin, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Leslie Bernstein.   

Abstract

Early studies of breast cancer raised substantial concern regarding risk associated with induced abortion and miscarriage. Literature reviews suggest that study findings depend heavily on the comparison group and that the use of parous women as a reference group for nulliparous women may artificially inflate risk. To examine the individual effects of induced abortion and miscarriage on breast cancer risk of parous and nulliparous women, 744 patients < or =40 years of age and diagnosed from 1983-1988 were matched by parity, age, and race with controls living in the same neighborhood in Los Angeles County. In-person interviews were conducted to obtain a detailed reproductive history. Risk estimates were obtained by conditional logistic regression using nulligravid women as the reference group for nulliparous women with a history of incomplete pregnancy and parous women with no incomplete pregnancies as the reference group for parous women with a history of incomplete pregnancy. Breast cancer risk of parous women was unrelated to a history of miscarriage or induced abortion. Breast cancer risk was reduced among nulliparous women with a history of induced abortion relative to nulligravid women, although the risk estimate was imprecise. Risk declined as the number of induced abortions increased (P = 0.04). Our results do not support the hypothesis that induced abortion or miscarriage increase the breast cancer risk of young women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12646509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  7 in total

1.  Influence of exercise activity on quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Adam R Kendall; Maya Mahue-Giangreco; Catherine L Carpenter; Patricia A Ganz; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Incomplete pregnancy is not associated with breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Katherine DeLellis Henderson; Jane Sullivan-Halley; Peggy Reynolds; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Christina A Clarke; Ellen T Chang; Susan Neuhausen; Giske Ursin; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Complementary and alternative therapies among very long-term breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  C L Carpenter; P A Ganz; L Bernstein
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Variation in breast cancer risk associated with factors related to pregnancies according to truncating mutation location, in the French National BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carrier cohort (GENEPSO).

Authors:  Julie Lecarpentier; Catherine Noguès; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Christine Lasset; Jean-Pierre Fricker; Olivier Caron; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Pascaline Berthet; Laurence Faivre; Valérie Bonadona; Bruno Buecher; Isabelle Coupier; Laurence Gladieff; Paul Gesta; François Eisinger; Marc Frénay; Elisabeth Luporsi; Alain Lortholary; Chrystelle Colas; Catherine Dugast; Michel Longy; Pascal Pujol; Julie Tinat; Rosette Lidereau; Nadine Andrieu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Spontaneous and therapeutic abortions and the risk of breast cancer among BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Eitan Friedman; Joanne Kotsopoulos; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Susan L Neuhausen; Claudine Isaacs; Barbara Weber; William D Foulkes; Pal Moller; Barry Rosen; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Peter Ainsworth; Mary Daly; Nadine Tung; Andrea Eisen; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Beth Karlan; Howard M Saal; Judy E Garber; Gad Rennert; Dawna Gilchrist; Charis Eng; Kenneth Offit; Michael Osborne; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  The Influence of Number and Timing of Pregnancies on Breast Cancer Risk for Women With BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutations.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Yuyan Liao; Karin Kast; Antonis C Antoniou; Jasmine A McDonald; Thea M Mooij; Christoph Engel; Catherine Nogues; Bruno Buecher; Véronique Mari; Jessica Moretta-Serra; Laurence Gladieff; Elisabeth Luporsi; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Alex Henderson; Carole Brewer; D Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Jackie Cook; Kai-Ren Ong; Louise Izatt; Munaza Ahmed; Patrick J Morrison; Charlotte J Dommering; Jan C Oosterwijk; Margreet G E M Ausems; Mieke Kriege; Saundra S Buys; Irene L Andrulis; Esther M John; Mary Daly; Michael Friedlander; Sue Anne McLachlan; Ana Osorio; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Christian F Singer; Yen Tan; Edith Olah; Marie Navratilova; Lenka Foretova; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson; Rita K Schmutzler; John L Hopper; Flora E van Leeuwen; David Goldgar; Roger L Milne; Douglas F Easton; Matti A Rookus; Nadine Andrieu
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-03-08

7.  Differences in reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in middle-aged women in Marin County, California and a sociodemographically similar area of Northern California.

Authors:  C Suzanne Lea; Nancy P Gordon; Lee Ann Prebil; Rochelle Ereman; Connie S Uratsu; Mark Powell
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.809

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.