Literature DB >> 12645612

Informed consent and research involving the newly dead.

Mark R Wicclair1.   

Abstract

This paper examines informed consent in relation to research involving the newly dead. Reasons are presented for facilitating advance decision making in relation to postmortem research, and it is argued that the informed consent of family members should be sought when the deceased have not made a premortem decision. Regardless of whether the dead can be harmed, there are two important respects in which family consent can serve to protect the dead: (1) protecting the deceased's body from being used for research that is incompatible with the person's postmortem preferences and values and (2) protecting the deceased's body's from being subject to disrespectful treatment. These claims are explained and justified, and several objections are critically examined. Additional reasons for securing family consent are presented including to protect them from additional emotional distress, to respect their wishes about wanting to have a say, and to maintain public trust in the medical profession and medical research. The paper also examines the scope of disclosure in relation to postmortem research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Uniform Anatomical Gift Act

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12645612     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2002.0028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  6 in total

1.  Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?

Authors:  J P Rigaud; J P Quenot; M Borel; I Plu; C Hervé; G Moutel
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Informed consent in research to improve the number and quality of deceased donor organs.

Authors:  Michael M Rey; Lorraine B Ware; Michael A Matthay; Gordon R Bernard; Amy L McGuire; Arthur L Caplan; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  A human-specific mutation limits nonhuman primate efficacy in preclinical xenotransplantation studies.

Authors:  Joshua P Waldman; Linda G Brock; Michael A Rees
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Genomic research with the newly dead: a crossroads for ethics and policy.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Eric T Juengst; Warren Whipple; Arlene M Davis
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Still Human: A Call for Increased Focus on Ethical Standards in Cadaver Research.

Authors:  Michelle C Bach
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.