Literature DB >> 12643569

Floral morphometrics and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Lycium (Solanaceae).

Jill S Miller1, D Lawrence Venable.   

Abstract

Plants of Lycium californicum, L. exsertum, and L. fremontii produce flowers that are either male-sterile (female) or hermaphroditic, and populations are morphologically gynodioecious. As is commonly found in gynodioecious species, flowers on female plants are smaller than those on hermaphrodites for a number of floral traits. Floral size dimorphism has often been hypothesized to be the result of either a reduction in female flower size that allows reallocation to greater fruit and seed production, or an increase in hermaphroditic flower size due to the increased importance of pollinator attraction and pollen export for hermaphroditic flowers. We provide a test of these two alternatives by measuring 11 floral characters in eight species of Lycium and using a phylogeny to reconstruct the floral size shifts associated with the evolution of gender dimorphism. Our analyses suggest that female flowers are reduced in size relative to the ancestral condition, whereas flowers on hermaphrodites have changed only slightly in size. Female and hermaphroditic flowers have also diverged both from one another and from ancestral cosexual species in several shape characteristics. We expected sexual dimorphism to be similar among the three dimorphic taxa, as gender dimorphism evolved only a single time in the ancestor of the American dimorphic lineage. While the floral sexual dimorphism is broadly similar among the three dimorphic species, there are some species-specific differences. For example, L. exsertum has the greatest floral size dimorphism, whereas L. fremontii had the greatest size-independent dimorphism in pistil characters. To determine the degree to which phylogenetic uncertainty affected reconstruction of ancestral character states, we performed a sensitivity analysis by reconstructing ancestral character states on alternative topologies. We argue that investigations such as this one, that examine floral evolution from an explicitly phylogenetic perspective, provide new insights into the study of the evolution of floral sexual dimorphism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12643569     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Correlated polymorphism in cytotype and sexual system within a monophyletic species, Lycium californicum.

Authors:  Jill S Miller; Ambika Kamath; Brian C Husband; Rachel A Levin
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Sexual dimorphism in the andromonoecious Euphorbia nicaeensis: effects of gender and inflorescence development.

Authors:  Eduardo Narbona; Pedro Luis Ortiz; Montserrat Arista
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Microstructural and histochemical characteristics of Lycium barbarum L. fruits used in folk herbal medicine and as functional food.

Authors:  Agata Konarska
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 3.356

5.  Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  Nelly A Gidaszewski; Michel Baylac; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Quantifying floral shape variation in 3D using microcomputed tomography: a case study of a hybrid line between actinomorphic and zygomorphic flowers.

Authors:  Chun-Neng Wang; Hao-Chun Hsu; Cheng-Chun Wang; Tzu-Kuei Lee; Yan-Fu Kuo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Gynodioecy in the common spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus L.) involves differences in the asymmetry of corolla shapes between sexually differentiated flowers.

Authors:  Jiri Neustupa
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.