Literature DB >> 12642763

C1-C2 posterior fusion in growing patients: long-term follow-up.

Patrizio Parisini1, Mario Di Silvestre, Tiziana Greggi, Giuseppe Bianchi.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of patients undergoing C1-C2 posterior fusion during childhood was undertaken.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the change in the sagittal curvature of the cervical spine in children after C1-C2 posterior fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been only a few reports on postoperative changes in the sagittal curvature of the cervical spine after C1-C2 posterior fusion in children. However, they have all described the onset of sagittal postoperative cervical deformities.
METHODS: Between January 1977 and December 1992, a total of 12 children underwent C1-C2 posterior fusion for atlantoaxial instability resulting from congenital malformation in eight, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in one, and rotatory subluxation in three. The average age at the time of surgery was 10.9 years (range 7-12 years). All children underwent a similar treatment program with gradual preoperative reduction in halo cast, followed by C1-C2 posterior fusion with Mersilene loops in two cases, wiring in eight (Gallie's or Brooks' techniques), and interlaminar clamps in the remaining two. The halo cast made it possible to avoid a hyperextended or hyperflexed C1-C2 position while performing the atlantoaxial fusion, thus ensuring a more anatomic position during C1-C2 fusion. In the postoperative period, the halo cast was maintained for 7 to 9 weeks. RESULTS Follow-up ranged from 7 years to 13 years. Preoperative alignment of the cervical spine was classified into two groups: lordosis (eight patients) and straight (four patients). Postoperative subaxial malalignment (kyphosis) occurred in four cases (33%): these patients showed evidence of spontaneous and gradual sagittal improvement and presented either a straight (two cases) or a lordotic (two cases) cervical spine at follow-up. Immediately after surgery, the cervical spine was normally aligned in the remaining eight patients (lordosis and straight alignment in six and two cases, respectively) and was unchanged at follow-up. At follow-up, none of the 12 patients had a cervical deformity on sagittal plane.
CONCLUSION: In children, a spontaneous realignment of the subaxial kyphosis observed after C1-C2 posterior fusion can be noted at follow-up, when a postoperative deformity occurs (33% in the present series). According to the present findings, it is not always mandatory to perform occipitocervical fusion in children with atlantoaxial instability just to prevent subaxial deformity in the cervical spine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642763     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000049961.22749.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric cervical spine injuries: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Martin Mortazavi; Pankaj A Gore; Steve Chang; R Shane Tubbs; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Changes in cervical spine curvature in pediatric patients following occipitocervical fusion.

Authors:  Ranjith K Moorthy; Vedantam Rajshekhar
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Complications and outcomes of posterior fusion in children with atlantoaxial instability.

Authors:  Ryoji Tauchi; Shiro Imagama; Zenya Ito; Kei Ando; Kenichi Hirano; Akio Muramoto; Hiroki Matsui; Fumihiko Kato; Yasutsugu Yukawa; Koji Sato; Tokumi Kanemura; Hisatake Yoshihara; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Inadvertent C2-C3 union after C1-C2 posterior fusion in adults.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Shuichi Aburakawa; Kazumasa Ueyama; Junji Ito; Akio Sannohe; Akihiro Okada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Fusions at the craniovertebral junction.

Authors:  Raheel Ahmed; Vincent C Traynelis; Arnold H Menezes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Internal fixation with occipital hooks construct for occipito-cervical arthrodesis. Results in 14 young or small children.

Authors:  Thierry Odent; Rony Bou Ghosn; Jean-Paul Dusabe; Michel Zerah; Christophe Glorion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  A Dual Approach for the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities: Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy and Posterior Decompression with Fusion.

Authors:  Andrew F Alalade; Elizabeth Ogando-Rivas; Jonathan Forbes; Malte Ottenhausen; Rafael Uribe-Cardenas; Ibrahim Hussain; Prakash Nair; Kurt Lehner; Harminder Singh; Ashutosh Kacker; Vijay K Anand; Roger Hartl; Ali Baaj; Theodore H Schwartz; Jeffrey P Greenfield
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2019-01-24

8.  Radiographic Outcomes of Upper Cervical Fusion for Pediatric Patients Younger Than 10 Years.

Authors:  Kei Watanabe; Toru Hirano; Keiichi Katsumi; Masayuki Ohashi; Hirokazu Shoji; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Takui Ito; Naoto Endo
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

Review 9.  Posterior Arthrodesis of Atlantoaxial Joint in Congenital Atlantoaxial Instability Under 5 Years of Age: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nikhil Goyal; Shivkumar Bali; Kaustubh Ahuja; Sunny Chaudhary; Sitanshu Barik; Pankaj Kandwal
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-11

10.  Complications of Posterior Fusion for Atlantoaxial Instability in Children With Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Yoshiki Takeoka; Kenichiro Kakutani; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Teppei Suzuki; Takashi Yurube; Izumi Komoto; Masao Ryu; Shinichi Satsuma; Koki Uno
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.