Literature DB >> 12642706

Factors affecting left ventricular ejection fraction using automated quantitative gated SPECT.

Isis Gayed1, Emma Cid, Fernando Boccalandero, Donald Podoloff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) quantification using automated quantitative gated SPECT have not been adequately investigated in patients in the clinical setting. Therefore, the authors studied the effect of defect size and Tc-99m tetrofosmin dose on the accuracy of LVEF calculation using the automated QGS program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two consecutive patients underwent gated rest and stress myocardial perfusion SPECT after administration of 8 and 27 mCi Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively. The LVEF was obtained for both the rest and stress studies using the QGS program and compared with the LVEF obtained using quantitative echocardiography performed within 2 weeks. Myocardial perfusion defects were recorded as scarring, ischemia, or mixed scarring and ischemia in 12 left ventricular segments. The defect size was evaluated by adding the number of affected segments.
RESULTS: The mean LVEF calculated using high-dose stress QGS, low-dose rest QGS, and echocardiography was 49.2% +/- 15%, 46.2% +/- 17% and 48.7% +/- 16.9% respectively, with no statistically significant differences. The LVEF obtained using high-dose stress QGS correlated better with echocardiography than did that obtained using low-dose rest QGS (r = 0.86 versus 0.76). In addition, when the high-dose stress LVEF in the 14 patients with normal myocardial perfusion was compared with that in 11 patients who had one- or two-segment perfusion defects, and 7 patients who had perfusion defects in > or = three segments, there was good correlation with echocardiography in the three patient groups (r = 0.85, 0.88, and 0.91, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial perfusion defects do not affect the accuracy of LVEF calculation using automated QGS. High-dose gated myocardial SPECT demonstrated better correlation with quantitative echocardiography LVEF results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12642706     DOI: 10.1097/01.RLU.0000057570.37612.C4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  3 in total

1.  Noninvasive modalities for the assessment of left ventricular function: all are equal but some are more equal than others.

Authors:  Tiong Keng Lim; Roxy Senior
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion defects with near-to-absent count reduction: a comparison of gated SPECT to radionuclide ventriculography in the determination of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Fevziye Canbaz; Tarik Basoglu; Oktay Yapici; Safak Aygul; Mustafa Yazici
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Comparison and co-relation of invasive and noninvasive methods of ejection fraction measurement.

Authors:  Darshan Godkar; Kalyan Bachu; Bijal Dave; Robert Megna; Selva Niranjan; Ashok Khanna
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.798

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.