Literature DB >> 12637678

Thoracic outlet: assessment with MR imaging in asymptomatic and symptomatic populations.

Xavier Demondion1, Eric Bacqueville, Christelle Paul, Bernard Duquesnoy, Eric Hachulla, Anne Cotten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the dynamic modifications of the thoracic outlet in asymptomatic volunteers and symptomatic patients and assess the presence and location of vasculonervous compressions in these two populations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five healthy volunteers and 54 patients with clinical symptoms of thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the thoracic outlets with their arms alongside their bodies and after a postural maneuver. Measurements were obtained at the interscalene triangle (thickness of anterior scalene muscle, interscalene angle), at the costoclavicular space (minimum costoclavicular distance, distance between inferior border of subclavius muscle and the anterior chest wall, maximum thickness of subclavius muscle, angle between first rib shaft and horizontal), and at the retropectoralis minor space (distance between posterior border of pectoralis minor muscle and posterior lining of axilla at the passage of the axillary vessels, thickness of pectoralis minor muscle). The presence and location of vasculonervous compressions were also assessed. Group data were analyzed with the Student t test.
RESULTS: Patients with TOS had a smaller costoclavicular distance after the postural maneuver (P <.001), a thicker subclavius muscle in both arm positions (P <.001), and a wider retropectoralis minor space after the postural maneuver (P <.001) than did volunteers. Venous compressions after the postural maneuver were observed in 47% of volunteers and 63% of patients at the prescalene space, in 54% of volunteers and 61% of patients at the costoclavicular space, and in 27% of volunteers and 30% of patients at the retropectoralis minor space. Arterial and nervous compressions, respectively, were seen in 72% and 7% of patients. No arterial or nervous compression was seen in volunteers. Except for venous thrombosis, vasculonervous compressions were demonstrated only with arm elevation. Only three thoracic outlet measurements differed significantly in both populations.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging appeared helpful in demonstrating the location and cause of arterial or nervous compressions. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12637678     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2272012111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  13 in total

1.  Thoracic inlet syndrome--a diagnosis made on CT pulmonary angiogram.

Authors:  Ahmed Fahim; Ged Avery; Simon Paul Hart
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome in young adults: single centre experience with minimum three-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Ciampi; Celeste Scotti; Simonetta Gerevini; Francesco De Cobelli; Roberto Chiesa; Gianfranco Fraschini; Giuseppe M Peretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  High resolution imaging of tunnels by magnetic resonance neurography.

Authors:  Ty K Subhawong; Kenneth C Wang; Shrey K Thawait; Eric H Williams; Shahreyar Shar Hashemi; Antonio J Machado; John A Carrino; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Case report: Thoracic outlet syndrome in an elite archer in full-draw position.

Authors:  Jin Young Park; Kyung Soo Oh; Hyun Yul Yoo; Jun Gyu Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  MRI of thoracic outlet syndrome in children.

Authors:  Govind B Chavhan; Vaishnavi Batmanabane; Prakash Muthusami; Alexander J Towbin; Gregory H Borschel
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-05-10

6.  The use of four-dimensional computed tomography to diagnose costoclavicular impingement causing thoracic outlet syndrome.

Authors:  Malin D Wijeratna; John M Troupis; Simon N Bell
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2014-05-27

Review 7.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in entrapment and compressive neuropathy--what, where, and how to see the peripheral nerves on the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image: part 2. Upper extremity.

Authors:  Sungjun Kim; Jin-Young Choi; Yong-Min Huh; Ho-Taek Song; Sung-Ah Lee; Seung Min Kim; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic and non-traumatic brachial plexopathies.

Authors:  Yiru Lorna Fan; Mohamad Isham Bin Othman; Niraj Dubey; Wilfred Cg Peh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 9.  Venous compression syndromes: clinical features, imaging findings and management.

Authors:  S R Butros; R Liu; G R Oliveira; S Ganguli; S Kalva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Upper extremity peripheral neuropathies: role and impact of MR imaging on patient management.

Authors:  Gustav Andreisek; Doris Burg; Ansgar Studer; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.