BACKGROUND: Although early in life there is little discernible difference in bone mass between boys and girls, at puberty sex differences are observed. It is uncertain if these differences represent differences in bone mass or just differences in anthropometric dimensions. AIM: The study aimed to identify whether sex independently affects bone mineral content (BMC) accrual in growing boys and girls. Three sites are investigated: total body (TB), femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 85 boys and 67 girls were assessed annually for seven consecutive years. BMC was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Biological age was defined as years from age at peak height velocity (PHV). Data were analysed using a hierarchical (random effects) modelling approach. RESULTS: When biological age, body size and body composition were controlled, boys had statistically significantly higher TB and FN BMC at all maturity levels (p < 0.05). No independent sex differences were found at the LS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a statistical significant sex effect is observed, it is less than the error of the measurement, and thus sex difference are debatable. In general, sex difference are explained by anthropometric difference.
BACKGROUND: Although early in life there is little discernible difference in bone mass between boys and girls, at puberty sex differences are observed. It is uncertain if these differences represent differences in bone mass or just differences in anthropometric dimensions. AIM: The study aimed to identify whether sex independently affects bone mineral content (BMC) accrual in growing boys and girls. Three sites are investigated: total body (TB), femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 85 boys and 67 girls were assessed annually for seven consecutive years. BMC was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Biological age was defined as years from age at peak height velocity (PHV). Data were analysed using a hierarchical (random effects) modelling approach. RESULTS: When biological age, body size and body composition were controlled, boys had statistically significantly higher TB and FN BMC at all maturity levels (p < 0.05). No independent sex differences were found at the LS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a statistical significant sex effect is observed, it is less than the error of the measurement, and thus sex difference are debatable. In general, sex difference are explained by anthropometric difference.
Authors: Norman K Pollock; Paul J Bernard; Karl Wenger; Sudipta Misra; Barbara A Gower; Jerry D Allison; Haidong Zhu; Catherine L Davis Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-07-16 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: B L Matthews; K L Bennell; H A McKay; K M Khan; A D G Baxter-Jones; R L Mirwald; J D Wark Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2006-04-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: M Lee; R W Nahhas; A C Choh; E W Demerath; D L Duren; W C Chumlea; R J Sherwood; B Towne; R M Siervogel; S A Czerwinski Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: E Z Movassagh; S Kontulainen; A D G Baxter-Jones; S Whiting; M Szafron; M Papadimitropoulos; H Vatanparast Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Katherine Gunter; Adam Dg Baxter-Jones; Robert L Mirwald; Hawley Almstedt; Robyn K Fuchs; Shantel Durski; Christine Snow Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: H William Kelly; Mark L Van Natta; Ronina A Covar; James Tonascia; Rebecca P Green; Robert C Strunk Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 7.124