Literature DB >> 12636952

Predictors of Papanicolaou smear return in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic.

Jessica A Kahn1, Elizabeth Goodman, Bin Huang, Gail B Slap, S Jean Emans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sexually active young women have relatively high rates of abnormal cervical cytology, yet compliance with return for Papanicolaou smear screening and follow-up appointments is poor. The aim of this study was to determine whether a theory-based model could explain compliance with return visits.
METHODS: Participants in this longitudinal cohort study were sexually active young women 12-24 years of age presenting to a hospital-based adolescent clinic. Participants completed self-administered surveys and were then followed for up to 15 months to assess for the outcome measure, return. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine variables independently associated with return.
RESULTS: The outcome measure, return, was available for 439 of 490 participants (90%). Mean participant age (+/- standard deviation) was 18.3 (+/- 2.2) years, 49% were black, 23% were Hispanic, and 51% had Medicaid health insurance. Variables independently associated with return included belief that the Papanicolaou smear will not be painful (odds ratio [OR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08, 2.83), belief that return for follow-up will prevent cervical cancer (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.12, 3.07), likelihood that the doctor will be honest (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.37, 17.5), and low self-reported impulsivity (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.06, 2.63). Family history of cervical cancer was associated with decreased likelihood of return (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08, 0.78).
CONCLUSION: Specific beliefs about Papanicolaou smears and providers, low self-reported impulsivity, and no family history of cervical cancer are associated with return for Papanicolaou smear screening and follow-up visits. These findings may guide the design of interventions to increase compliance with recommendations for Papanicolaou smear return.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12636952     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02592-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  12 in total

1.  Design of a Novel Low Cost Point of Care Tampon (POCkeT) Colposcope for Use in Resource Limited Settings.

Authors:  Christopher T Lam; Marlee S Krieger; Jennifer E Gallagher; Betsy Asma; Lisa C Muasher; John W Schmitt; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Erin K Tagai; Kuang-Yi Wen; Minsun Lee; Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Deirdre Kurtz; John Scarpato; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-01-31

3.  Improving women's experience during speculum examinations at routine gynaecological visits: randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Dean A Seehusen; Dawn R Johnson; J Scott Earwood; Sankar N Sethuraman; Jamie Cornali; Kelly Gillespie; Maria Doria; Edwin Farnell; Jason Lanham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-27

4.  Recommendations on routine screening pelvic examination: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care adoption of the American College of Physicians guideline.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Ainsley Moore; Brett D Thombs
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Concern is not based on evidence.

Authors:  Ainsley Moore
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Perspectives on Pap test follow-up care among rural Appalachian women.

Authors:  Nancy Schoenberg; Julie Baltisberger; Shoshana Bardach; Mark Dignan
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2010-09

7.  Acceptability of human papillomavirus self testing in female adolescents.

Authors:  J A Kahn; D I Bernstein; S L Rosenthal; B Huang; L M Kollar; J L Colyer; A M Tissot; P A Hillard; D Witte; P Groen; G B Slap
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Home-based chlamydia testing of young people attending a music festival--who will pee and post?

Authors:  Rachel Sacks-Davis; Judy Gold; Campbell K Aitken; Margaret E Hellard
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Testing a Motivational Interviewing Implementation Intervention in Adolescent HIV Clinics: Protocol for a Type 3, Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar; Karen MacDonell; Jason E Chapman; Lisa Todd; Sitaji Gurung; Demetria Cain; Rafael E Dilones; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-06-07

10.  Adolescent Trials Network for HIV-AIDS Scale It Up Program: Protocol for a Rational and Overview.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar; Jeffrey T Parsons; Bonita F Stanton
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.