Literature DB >> 12635920

Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures.

Drew Westen1, Robert Rosenthal.   

Abstract

Construct validity is one of the most central concepts in psychology. Researchers generally establish the construct validity of a measure by correlating it with a number of other measures and arguing from the pattern of correlations that the measure is associated with these variables in theoretically predictable ways. This article presents 2 simple metrics for quantifying construct validity that provide effect size estimates indicating the extent to which the observed pattem of correlations in a convergent-discriminant validity matrix matches the theoretically predicted pattern of correlations. Both measures, based on contrast analysis, provide simple estimates of validity that can be compared across studies, constructs, and measures meta-analytically, and can be implemented without the use of complex statistical procedures that may limit their accessibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635920     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.84.3.608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  42 in total

1.  Multimethod assessment of psychopathy in relation to factors of internalizing and externalizing from the Personality Assessment Inventory: the impact of method variance and suppressor effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Blonigen; Christopher J Patrick; Kevin S Douglas; Norman G Poythress; Jennifer L Skeem; Scott O Lilienfeld; John F Edens; Robert F Krueger
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2010-03

2.  Validity of measures is no simple matter.

Authors:  Lee Sechrest
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Evidence for the criterion validity and clinical utility of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory.

Authors:  Katherine M Thomas; Aidan G C Wright; Mark R Lukowitsky; M Brent Donnellan; Christopher J Hopwood
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2012-02-06

Review 4.  Tests examining skill outcomes in sport: a systematic review of measurement properties and feasibility.

Authors:  Samuel J Robertson; Angus F Burnett; Jodie Cochrane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Criterion validity of measures of perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco compared to cigarettes.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Anh B Nguyen; Annette R Kaufman; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Parental Flooding During Conflict: A Psychometric Evaluation of a New Scale.

Authors:  Tamara Del Vecchio; Michael F Lorber; Amy M Smith Slep; Jill Malik; Richard E Heyman; Heather M Foran
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2016-11

7.  Achievement-Motivated Behavior in Individual Sports: Evidence for the Construct and Criterion Validity of the AMBIS-I Coach-Rating Scale.

Authors:  Claudia Zuber; Michael J Schmid; Achim Conzelmann
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Measuring youth beliefs about the harms of e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco compared to cigarettes.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Erin Keely O'Brien; Anh B Nguyen; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  National Testing of the Nursing-Kids Intensity of Care Survey for Pediatric Long-term Care.

Authors:  Amanda J Hessels; Sharon W Darby; Edwin Simpser; Lisa Saiman; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.145

Review 10.  The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Tara M Augenstein; Mo Wang; Sarah A Thomas; Deborah A G Drabick; Darcy E Burgers; Jill Rabinowitz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.