Literature DB >> 12635790

Poor results with the Shuttle Stop: resorbable versus nonresorbable intramedullar cement restrictor in a prospective and randomized study with a 2-year follow-up.

Knud Gade Freund1, Niels Herold, Niels D Røck, Per Riegels-Nielsen.   

Abstract

In a randomized prospective study we compared 2 femoral plugs as regards probable migration of the restrictor, cement leakage and possible early aseptic loosening. In group I, the femoral canal was plugged with a resorbable Shuttle Stop (HC Implants, BV. Leiden, The Netherlands). In group II, a nonresorbable restrictor of polyethylene was used (De Puy, UK). Both groups were identical as regards age, gender and primary disease. All patients were followed for at least 2 years after surgery. Postoperatively, we found more failures with displacement of the femoral plug and cement leakage in group I than in group II. At the 2-year follow-up, we found no differences in stem loosening or grade of radiolucent lines in the cement-bone interface. We can not recommend the Shuttle Stop for femoral canal sealing in total hip replacememt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12635790     DOI: 10.1080/00016470310013626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  2 in total

Review 1.  Osteolysis in cemented total hip arthroplasty involving the OptiPlug cement restrictor: more than an incident?

Authors:  N M A I Hanssen; M G M Schotanus; A D Verburg
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 2.  Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (34,020 Patients): What Have We Learnt?

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Simon R Platt; Tim N Board; Martyn L Porter
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.